Capital Ship Point Defense

[n00bl3t]

Anyways, about all that bomber talk.

If you truly believe your statement about the all powerness of bombers, I challenge you.. Find any bomber pilot, any at all, can be the best one on the server, and get him to fight my Nyx. And you shall see that I'll either beat him, or be close to it. And an average bomber pilot will plain and simple get creamed by a standard fighter pilot.

A bomber can pwn a fighter. Since it can, it was used as an example.

Pick any bomber pilot you want *winks on ench*, and I'll take any cruiser you pick, me as an occasional capship pilot. Then we shall see how this works.

Let me think.

Cam, this is directly related to you flying one of the largest battleships in the game. And also directly related to flying an RP-oriented ship.

Cry me a river, build me a bridge, and get the *bleep* over it. It's getting old, and all you are doing is proving us right in our knowledge of ship balance and your intelligence (or lack thereof).

Yes, we damn well could put 5k range solaris turrets in the game, but did you EVER stop and think about the effects on the other side? Did you think it would be fair to the people who prefer smaller ships if battleships were an ubermegaIpwntyoubcuzuranoob ship?

The fact of the matter is, it wouldn't be. It's not as easy as you think, which is probably why you were never good at it. Quit your crying and go back to your 4.82 server if you want, but you'll never get any further.

Also, I should say that this is an RP SERVER. Come on, battleships should be used more as a supply depot for fighters. They should be more defense than offense.

RP relates to PVP.

RP your way out, or are you too much of a PvP whore to understand?

YOU'RE A ZONER. YOU NO LIKEY PVP. YOU LIKEY PEACE AND THE BORDER WORLDS.

And on a side note, you live in the USA. Spell like it.

Yes. Patronising Cam will solve the situation. Well done. Labelling him a PVP whore because he does not agree with your viewpoints. Well done. Ignoring the fact that Zoners do have enemies, such as the Keepers, Das Wilde and the Harvesters. It would be nice to say priceless, but no, well done.

Maybe the powers that be are trying to tell you something.

The powers that be have included capital ships in this mod. The moment they do not want them to be used is the moment that they remove them from the mod.

No there isn't, because Cam stubbornly repeats his moronic and generally contradictory "bomber-whore" statements.

We've all tried to explain to him that caps can't be overpowered and that it's his fault he's in an uberhuge ship.

Explain how it is contradictory.

No, what he is saying is he should be able to return the favour in terms of damage. He currently cannot do that because his guns lack the range.

but yeah. stop wasting forum space and go play on a capwhore server or something.

:mellow:

I just fear the day when my fighter will be unable to enter a fight which includes other fighters and a cap if that cap's anti-fighter/bomber weapons are 100% effective.

It's easy to theorize it all, and it all works very nice in theory.
But when I think of the fact that 80% of fights I get in include enemy capital ships, what will come of me.. I dislike getting capraped you know.
And I believe it's good time I start whining too then, lest the cap preferers hog all the whining and get their way.

There, my first prejudicial statement. Feels good, I am finally integrated well into the community.:mellow:

Why say "cap preferers" instead of capwhores, when you are just going to accuse us of "caprape" anyway? Also, I would fear the day when capital ships are useless against fighters, but it is already here.

SP quote:

Libby Cruiser: " Those gunboats are too fast for our turrets!".

Now imagine how too fast fighters are..
A battleship should not even be able to hit a dodging fighter in my opinion, at least not with turrets.

Yes. Where Liberty Cruisers could destroy battleships, not get killed by bombers, join The Order and roam the Omicrons.

Now will you cap users please stop whining.

It is called a discussion, regardless of your inability to recognise that.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.