Capital Ship Point Defense

[n00bl3t]

True.

However, Cap pilots need to accept that their vessels are not made to destroy fighters as well as capital ships. If they were then there would be no need to fly anything smaller than a capital ship.

No. Capital ships should be able to defend against bombers.

And had I seen some more people using genuine arguments except yourself and maybe one more, and not *points at Cam* that, I might be more in favour of these requests to buff anti-fighter/bomber weaponry.

And for those claims of yours exactly, that is why I do not want my puny little fighter to get regularly killed while in one of those huge fights with balanced fleets by a cap.

Lovely. Balance depends on whether you like what Cam posts? (The same thing could be said about smiley-man's posts, however, nothing has been.)

So what the capital ship players are asking for is longer reaching weapons to attack bombers and fighters right well I do have a question. Torp's seem to be slow moving weapons and so shooting them from a range that is outside of the turrets of a cap should leave them a sizable flight time before hitting the target so why don't you try shooting down the torpedo rather than the bomber I mean if I had to launch a large amount of torps to wipe out a battleship then I would be worried about the cost as to help this I say raise the price of torpedoes as that way you also make bomber pilots think about if they will use a torp against a fighter as the cost of buying a new one could make it inefficent.

Do you play on the server? (Serious question.)


Edit: Split into two posts for quotes to work.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.