Battle Razors

[Jinx]

voted no - and next time, please make a better poll option, not a suggestive one...

anyway - i am still not convinced that a bomber cannot dodge a 800ms weapon with a limited effective range that cannot be sprayed like a primary. - additionally to that, razors are used by ships that are too different to judge on the performance of one - that is why weapons are averagely effective.

here is an example:

the kusari destroyer does very well with a razor - maybe cause its small, maybe cause its almost gunboat like in its agility / turning... however the corsair cruiser, one of the larger ones needs to make use of the very same weapon - it cannot do the same the kusari destroyer does - but still the weapon must remain at least mildly useful. so should we nerf the weapon on the kusari destroyer? ( so they are utterly useless on a corsair cruiser? )

same applies to battleships. - the osiris makes a PERFECT use of flaks and solaris turrets, but on a zoner juggernaut, flaks and solaris turrets simply don t work cause the ship is too large and the camera is too distant. - should we IMPROVE flaks and solaris for the juggernaut? ( so they are deadly on the osiris? ) <--- same logic, turned around.

choices should be :

should the speed of the battlerazor be changed
* yes
* no
* keep it the way it is

faster or slower
* faster
* slower

how fast / slow
* 300 slower
* 250 slower
* 200 slower
* 150 slower
* 100 slower
* 50 slower
* just slower, don t know how much
* voted "keep it the way it is"
* just faster, don t know how fast
* 50 faster
* 100 faster
* 150 faster
* 200 faster
* 250 faster
* 300 faster
* voted keep it as it is




that is a poll that gives voters all the choices - not only the ones you want them to vote. - and such a poll could also turn out not to be in your favour - but the question then is - do we want a majority reflection? or just back a particular opinion up.

then there s the question - what is such a poll for? - when 90% vote that the razor should be 300ms faster... should it be like that?

if 90% vote that it should be 300ms slower - should we do it? - only cause one decision is in favour, the other is not doesn t make a vote more or less valid. - when making a poll that wants to reflect a serious issue, one should also be ready to face whatever consequence there is




most polls here remind me on the election polls in 1933 for the german rheichstag...

it was like

vote [insert dictator here]

YES : O

no : o

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC