Developments of the Bretonian Region

[pbrione]

Alright, well if we don't touch any unlawful bases, apart from Edinburgh there don't seem to be any objections to the rest of the plan, so here it is again:


Changes we're proposing/requesting are:

In Cambridge:
The Line in Cambridge should be extended/Beefed up. If you don't know what it its, the Line is all the weapons platforms beside the tradelane from Planet Camb to Battleship Norfolk. It is a vanilla object, and in rp, ineffective(against vanilla ships, in Bretonia, this means it targets mkI HF, and it sees VHF every day). I'd like to see it at least noticeable...denser Weapons Platforms would be great.

In New London:
The Molly Destroyer moved again, because, well, it should keep moving around.
Kensington...Could use a bit more substance than just a chain of docking ports...more towers, or..something. Its just shabby.

In Leeds:
An ALG base of some sort, for cleaning up the mess. They're getting a zone for mining toxic waste there, and they're a vanilla ally of Gateway.

Edinburgh:
The Edinburgh Project. See thread: http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35659

Dublin:
A gate to Chester, in the top right corner, and lane project down towards the Essex

Chester:
A terraformable moon for that gas giant, and a Planetform survey station, a BMM military shipyards, as well as a gate project.

Manchester
Addition of a Gateway Base, opposite Sheffield.

Newcastle
Lane and gate to Cortez, Carlile eventually habitable. There's rumors about work being done on Carlile, and the Cortez gate would improve playerflow through newcastle. Kuriane suspects it wont mess up the trade routes much because of the size of Newcastle


All of the tradelanes/Gates should start as projects for a mod, then later become active bit by bit. The bases should hopefully expand over time, as well.

=========================================

We are open to discussing changes to unlawful bases however the community believes they might work.

Anything related to Edinburgh, please discuss in the seperate thread here: http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=35659

If Seth would care to make a start on the above, we can see what the results look like and then discuss them in more depth. An additional Swansea system is also an interesting idea worth looking at. I beleive Baconsoda also has plans for Poole, which should eventually be included into the whole project.

---

Sir Stanley Nelson




<span style="color:#000066">Charles Canning </span><span style="color:#000066"> Foreign Secretary</span>