Zoner sub-division

[kuth]

I'd also like to point out to you Dab that what you are offering the Alliance in the form of this Security Committee is the very thing the Alliance offered the CoZ and almost all of the remaining members called it a power grab. The fact that you give yourself a seat on the Security Committee only backs the fact that you refuse to give up your seat of power.

Jinx didn't declare herself king of 11. She removed if from CoZ rule because simply put under your leadership the CoZ has made many enemies. You complain about what Jinx did but I don't see you complaining about what Beck did with 14? Why is that?

Zoner official factions - [TAZ], OSI-, (]c[) - are able to ask the admins to repfix a person to be hostile to Zoners, by the by.

Per recent events so does the Council of Zoners even though they are unofficial.

You're making legislation that is drastically slanted in your favor, then try to blame us because we reject the idea.. If you came up with a legitimate deal that is actually plausible from our standpoint, you'll have more luck.

The legislation you sent to us is the exact same legislation we sent you. You called it a power grab.

The Sec Comm works exactly as the Alliance Committee works yet you feel the need to add yet another sub group of Zoners and give yourself a seat upon it. Why not open that seat up to voting within the CoZ? Rather afraid you wouldn't get it would you? If the CoZ wants unity in the form of this Sec Com why don't they join the Alliance and have it via the AC? Why create another group? O that's right, most of them won't compromise at all. Even over a damn name.

---

Lurker