"Cutlass" Bomber

[tansytansey]

Sorry... I thought the forums were for posting ideas and critiquing submissions. My bad.

I was under the impression that the Devs wanted to move away from light/agile-ish Bombers towards slower, heavier ones... and quite frankly this doesn't look very heavy to me. Adding some kind of representation for torp tubes was simply a suggestion for an easy way to go about making it look more like a BOMBER and less like a VHF with a halo. :rolleyes:

I already said though that I was not going to do this. You expressed an idea, I expressed my disagreement. But in the end, it's up to me to make the decisions on how the model looks. I've taken several good ideas into account so far and made adjustments accordingly. There were also several bad ideas, which I will not implement on this model, such as torpedo tubes.
This bomber may look light, but it is roughly the same size as the Falcata. And I assure you, there is nothing light about the Falcata.
No argument you present will make me put two ugly torpedo tubes on this ship.

EDIT: Not only that, but when I last made a bomber (The LPI Bomber) which WAS big and heavy, straight away got accused of being a pregnant Liberator. Doing the same to this model won't turn it into a bomber, it will make it a pregnant Sabre.

---

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.