For the love of god!

[-Zulz-]

Protecting you home and your traders. It is a good RP, though I fail to see why IMG would care about any traders other than their own, but regardless you DO stray away from that. If you were truly following this, it would mean you patrolling IMG territory and running escorts. Not hunting down each and every unlawful in sight even in their systems (and I've seen you go after more than just OC before even when they weren't pirating a trader).

IMG ID says can hunt pirates in their ZOI, and where they have a base, not 'defend' against pirates there. Falkland base in an IMG base in Tau 37, giving the right to attack a rule-lawyering OC cruiser in Tau 37. The can defend TRADERS anywhere, not only IMG traders. Please read the rules and IDs before you tell people, and other people who werent there, what is wrong and right. And btw while they wer escorting me, I asked them if they wanted to go through california instead of colorado because I saw some pirated in california, they said no that would be oorp. So much for that.

Well, IMG and BAF are -not- at war, it really didnt cause the kusari-Bretonia war, that was just a very flimsy excuse, BMM and IMG arent even likely to shoot eachother in Tau even if they're allowed to, IMG -ARE- bretonia, a war with bretonia would be a civil war and not one IMG would survive long in. the CR and BAF are at war, but they're nothing to do with IMG at all. Furthermore, IMG doesnt have a military, its a corp and has some security, but its not a military power and I dont really think its a good idea to portray it as such.

Wasnt there but seems the BAF attacked them, not vice-versa. Some text ingame says there was fighting between IMG and Bret... but I guess what started a war is always open to interpetation on bith sides.

The IMG ID is honestly just asking to be abused, wide ZOI, its own shipline and the ability to use capital ships mostly unrestricted (except by players), no other corp can even go as far as Gunboats, with merc/freelancer ID yeah, but no respectable corp does that. The IMG ID's current state and the remnants of capital ship use is mostly from CR, the IMG| faction hasnt taken the initiative to fix it, though these fellas are currently fighter/bombers, I cant help but expect capital ships coming sooner or later.

On the BAF incident, just some indie cap as usual, but if you screw around in Bretonia hunting pirates that are not attacking IMG shipments or attempt to act as a military, you will be told to sling your hook or be removed.

'Screw around in Bretonia hunting pirates?' The ID specifically says you can do that. The IMG ID can be abused? Lets be honnest... all this flaming of them is pirates lobbying against them because they are messing up your bugget. And ur using not very effective rule lawyering and wrong oorp accusations to achieve your goals. Now you want to change the IMG ID so NO ONE will ever interfere with your pirating? Why not change the rules to 'you arent allowed to defend your self against pirates' while we are at it, which is really what you are trying to achieve.

EDIT: You are aware that you were defending a LAWFUL BAF cruiser attacking img fighters and bombers when they were hunting pirates, like their iD specifically says they can, right? Duh?