• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 531 532 533 534 535 … 779 Next »
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers
Offline Baltar
07-04-2009, 11:12 PM,
#47
Member
Posts: 1,621
Threads: 28
Joined: Jan 2008

' Wrote:Logic flaw? I think not! The only thing the "softening up" process does more often than not, at least with me it does, it make someone very angry. I may play a diplomat but he is a diplomat with a very hot temper and a short fuse but that's beside the point. I have yet to rp a pirate out of a tax. I usually get "pay or die" which is week. But, I do keep a list on the board by my machine of those who use our fine facilities (Freeports) and still find the need to tax us. Yes, the word is getting out.

If they decide to just start shooting, well, I'll take my chances even though I will most likely lose, especially now since most pirates pirate in gunboats.

@eyvind,

I'll call it as I see it, like it or not but I'm not hyjacking this thread on it. If you don't like me calling it this way, start a thread and call me out on it.

*headdesk* My point is this ... rule 6.19 applies ONLY to a piracy event (combat vessel vs trade vessel) ... rule 6.21 applies to PVP (combat vessel vs combat vessel) ... that's the difference between the two rules.

Now ... sorry you haven't come across me ... but don't throw the baby out with the bath water. If I based my opinion on lawfuls completely on encounters with those that just give me the "die pirate" then I'd be a bit prejudice ... correct? Not all pirates get paid ... and some let they're target go (done it many times myself). But pirates who encounter those traders that give us the "just kill me its cheaper" line don't do your argument any good. Now ... did you go back and read or are you just on the attack?

On the gunboat bit ... have you ever tried to take on a container transport in a fighter? As you say ... MOST pirates are in gunboats ... well that's probably because MOST traders are in huge transports. Size of the pirate is usually gonna be dictated by size of the target. Fighters are great against freighters (with small cargo holds) but they can barely get the shields to go down on a huge transport. And with those transports carrying hundreds of bats/bots and 12 class 7 turrets (on the CT) ... fighters don't stand a chance. So ... when this server starts to see more small freighters we might see the population of pirates in fighters go up in kind. I guess what I'm saying is that your complaint about most pirates in gunboats is falling on deaf ears ... its a mute point.
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:24 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Skysurfer - 06-27-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:33 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by MB52 - 06-27-2009, 11:36 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Elsdragon - 06-27-2009, 11:39 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by worldstrider - 06-27-2009, 11:44 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Rudo - 06-27-2009, 11:44 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by dead_shot - 06-27-2009, 11:46 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by worldstrider - 06-27-2009, 11:52 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-27-2009, 11:58 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Bear - 06-28-2009, 12:01 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Pinko - 06-28-2009, 12:06 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by BaconSoda - 06-28-2009, 12:09 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Grumblesaur - 06-28-2009, 12:33 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by masternerdguy - 06-28-2009, 12:38 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by tazuras - 06-28-2009, 01:30 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-28-2009, 01:34 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Fletcher - 06-28-2009, 01:36 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 06-28-2009, 01:46 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by DeathsOverture - 06-28-2009, 01:51 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-28-2009, 02:12 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Ogris - 06-28-2009, 02:14 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by DeathsOverture - 06-28-2009, 02:27 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by darthbeck - 06-28-2009, 02:37 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by JakeSG - 06-28-2009, 03:25 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by tansytansey - 06-28-2009, 04:35 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by eyvind - 06-28-2009, 08:07 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 06-28-2009, 09:49 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Inconcessus - 06-28-2009, 10:52 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Fellow Hoodlum - 06-28-2009, 10:56 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Benjamin - 06-28-2009, 11:01 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Markam - 06-28-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Eppy - 06-28-2009, 11:33 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Monster - 06-28-2009, 11:46 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Cellulanus - 06-29-2009, 12:32 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by sovereign - 06-29-2009, 12:42 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by frozen - 06-29-2009, 12:49 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by El Nino - 06-29-2009, 01:16 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Rudo - 06-29-2009, 04:15 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Tomtomrawr - 06-29-2009, 01:01 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by El Nino - 06-29-2009, 11:23 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Doc Holliday - 06-30-2009, 12:01 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by eyvind - 06-30-2009, 01:43 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 06-30-2009, 02:18 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Doc Holliday - 06-30-2009, 03:11 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-04-2009, 11:12 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 07-04-2009, 11:21 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-04-2009, 11:35 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 07-05-2009, 12:08 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-05-2009, 02:52 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 07-05-2009, 03:41 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by BaconSoda - 07-05-2009, 03:52 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Walker - 07-05-2009, 04:39 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-05-2009, 10:32 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode