• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 531 532 533 534 535 … 779 Next »
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers
Offline Baltar
07-05-2009, 10:32 PM,
#55
Member
Posts: 1,621
Threads: 28
Joined: Jan 2008

' Wrote:Hmmm, not sure about generic Pirate ID, but the faction pirates can use them, and even sell transports. I'd also certainly like to see more commodity theft - lots of unlawful factions are supposed to attack targets with needed supplies according to rumors and such.

I'm not sure I agree Freighters are non-combatants. Certainly they're armed heavily enough to be used aggressively. With that in mind, they would also probably be used in more of a support role.

Personally, I think Piracy and all those other situations should fall under the same guidelines. Why should traders get to ignore certain rules?

Freighters are small vessels designed specifically for trade NOT combat. To use a freighter as a combat vessel would be OORP. Their weapons are for "defense" ... NOT offense.

As for putting piracy under the same rules as PVP ... I think you'd make quite a few people upset. First off ... traders would get sanctioned for continuing trade in systems they were killed in ... and would tick off the admin team since the number of violation reports would go up dramatically. In other words ... we already have plenty of non-role playing traders who run silent and pretty much do anything and everything to avoid any contact with other players while they run along their trade routes. I recall a few traders who have bragged about watching movies, reading books, etc while they went along their trade routes. Talk about taking up a server slot while AFK!!!

Piracy must have its own set of rules for the simple fact that it is a unique event. Same goes for smugglers caught by lawfuls.


' Wrote:The reasoning behind traders being able to ignore the 4-hour-rule was that pirates would benefit from pirating traders continually, and traders would learn better. Of course, this is from a time where there were much fewer people on the server and people actually got along. These days, it just ends up in people going *insert whiny voice here* "Pirates should be nicer!"

Now, I would normally write up a rant about how pirates should shoot first and be generally meaner, but we're derailing....

No sense in even responding to these whine fest anymore Bacon ... these threads are endless. A new anti-pirate thread is created nearly every day. I'm to the point I'm gonna just ignore any further threads as they're pointless. These guys aren't trying to learn anything ... they just want the rules changed in their favor.
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:24 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Skysurfer - 06-27-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 06-27-2009, 11:33 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by MB52 - 06-27-2009, 11:36 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Elsdragon - 06-27-2009, 11:39 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by worldstrider - 06-27-2009, 11:44 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Rudo - 06-27-2009, 11:44 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by dead_shot - 06-27-2009, 11:46 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by worldstrider - 06-27-2009, 11:52 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-27-2009, 11:58 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Bear - 06-28-2009, 12:01 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Pinko - 06-28-2009, 12:06 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by BaconSoda - 06-28-2009, 12:09 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Grumblesaur - 06-28-2009, 12:33 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by masternerdguy - 06-28-2009, 12:38 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by tazuras - 06-28-2009, 01:30 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-28-2009, 01:34 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Fletcher - 06-28-2009, 01:36 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 06-28-2009, 01:46 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by DeathsOverture - 06-28-2009, 01:51 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Errant.Venture - 06-28-2009, 02:12 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Ogris - 06-28-2009, 02:14 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by DeathsOverture - 06-28-2009, 02:27 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by darthbeck - 06-28-2009, 02:37 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by JakeSG - 06-28-2009, 03:25 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by tansytansey - 06-28-2009, 04:35 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by eyvind - 06-28-2009, 08:07 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 06-28-2009, 09:49 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Inconcessus - 06-28-2009, 10:52 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Fellow Hoodlum - 06-28-2009, 10:56 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Benjamin - 06-28-2009, 11:01 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Markam - 06-28-2009, 11:29 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Eppy - 06-28-2009, 11:33 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Monster - 06-28-2009, 11:46 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Cellulanus - 06-29-2009, 12:32 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by sovereign - 06-29-2009, 12:42 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by frozen - 06-29-2009, 12:49 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by El Nino - 06-29-2009, 01:16 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Rudo - 06-29-2009, 04:15 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Tomtomrawr - 06-29-2009, 01:01 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by El Nino - 06-29-2009, 11:23 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Doc Holliday - 06-30-2009, 12:01 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by eyvind - 06-30-2009, 01:43 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 06-30-2009, 02:18 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Doc Holliday - 06-30-2009, 03:11 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-04-2009, 11:12 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Guest - 07-04-2009, 11:21 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-04-2009, 11:35 PM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 07-05-2009, 12:08 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-05-2009, 02:52 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by farmerman - 07-05-2009, 03:41 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by BaconSoda - 07-05-2009, 03:52 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Walker - 07-05-2009, 04:39 AM
Notice: Rule loophole: Bombers - by Baltar - 07-05-2009, 10:32 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode