Brainstorm: Warzones with differing PvP rules?

[Fletcher]

An idea came across my mind, what if the House War zones, e.g. North Leeds and the Outcast v Corsair Omicron Eta became classified as a Warzone under PvP rules, well here are some rule alterations, that I think can be tweaked:

Server Rules Link

• Re-engagements are allowed
  
• Using cruise to catch up is permitted
  
• Charging cruise engines isn't a loss, being destroyed is
  
• You do not have to leave the system
  

These are some of the rules that I believe can be tweaked for the following goal:
Longer, and bigger battles with a chance for RP in-between and in fights, and hopefully, more fun and more interesting fights.

With these rules, it is possible for ambushes to be placed, it is possible to 'cut-and-run', it is possible to re-arm bombers mid battle, it is possible to spy, see their forces, run away when they get too close, then with help fight back.

However, for these rules to apply ONLY the major factions or belligerents can have these taking place. For example, only the Corsairs and Outcasts can have these rules applied in their war. And BAF and KNF forces can only have the special rules in North Leeds, I am not sure if central can apply, or the whole system. I am also unsure if the BPA can have the rules also, since they're defending.

No freelancers, pirate, mercenaries or whatever can have these rules applied.

This is not a suggestion, it is an idea that I am interested to see discussed in open forum. At the moment I can see the benefits and some downsides. But you people have a better perspective than I.

So, feedback?;)

---

"Oh chuffing blimey, another day, another person being whiney!"
Fletcher's Feedback and Stories Thread