Administrators: Server Rule 1.2.

[n00bl3t]

When was its use last threatened?

Ok, I'll change that ... You will stay out of Liberty please, or we invoke rule 1.2. There will be no further
discussion concerning that now.

(That is not the whole quote, the rest of refers to the sanction, and you are advised to read the whole thread before developing any opinion on that sanction.)

I used it once to ban a guy that was sexually harassing players on the server.

Anyhoo, after 5 pages of this, all I can see is a complaint without any solutions offered.

(Oh, & for the record, what does this mean? This post is the only post I made in here so you didn't quote me at all...but I did notice that you misquoted Cannon by changing the color of his text from yellow to green...why?)

That could have been done under the insulting rule.

It was meant to be a clarification and discussion thread. (When and if it's purpose changes the people in the thread will be alerted.)

It means you posted with an alternate.

Cannon's post went from green, to purple to yellow.

What about everyone who was present on the 4.85 development team that traded their way to riches before the new economy took effect?

:lol:

What disturbs me more is this about the rules;

"No you cannot see the evidence put against you unless the sanction reporter agrees on".

Ermm, sorry but it is total BS (bull... ermm battleship).

This is actually something that OPENS way to lots of lots of abuse options. I know some of the admins and they are all cool people, lovely to talk to them and befriended etc. but this doesnt change the fact that this is such an open issue regarding personal abuse and revenge or plotting on someone.

This game system is not a republic, yes, but monarchy can have democracy in it.

Morning Ophi.:D

That is another topic.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.