' Wrote:My first post has not been edited since any of your account(s) came into this thread.
It was one recent example that stuck in my head, since 1.2 is meant to be heavily discussed and all that. (I assumed this to be the case even before responses were made here.)
As for power-drunkedness, bias, negligence, conspiracies, et cetera, that is not my point. Just a discussion about the rule, how it has been used, how it will be used and the community's thoughts on anything relevant to it.
Remedies are un-needed. I just want to broaden my understanding of 1.2, for now.
Honestly, no worries. I've seen non-issues morph into hot buttons with little effort for years now & with as many pages as this thread has generated so far...I can't help but say: "I hear what's bein' said, but what's the point?"
It's already been made clear most eloquently by others ::albeit without the desired magical green color:: that the rule is a basically a catch-all...so now that it's stated & understood, why continue to beat a dead horse? if it's an actual problem worth discussing, then it should have some solutions presented, otherwise, the thread is just spinning its wheels.
