My my, Devil Cat, what a great start to what had better be a great novella. If it isn't... I'll do absolutely nothing. Still! Let my admittedly empty threat scare and confuse you!
Of course, I'm not being serious about some of that. I loved that beginning. I was kidding about the threat being threatening. So the second part, about me having no consequence, was true. Understand?
Oh, and that theory that whose-his-name, Pultolski? Yes, his theory makes sense. I can't grasp it entirely, mind you, but it does seem to make sense to me. Oh well.
Wonderful start. Simply brilliant. Your writing style is great, and I only found one problem, which is that a theorem is something that can be proven (i.e. a geometric theorem, which can be proven either by postulates and corollaries): Pultolski had no theorem within a theorem within a theorem: he has theories. An annoying difference, and something that no one who hadn't recently reviewed vocabulary would catch. It doesn't detract, mind you, but I thought you may wish to know.
Oh, and a big problem...
THERE ISN'T ENOUGH! Give me more, blast you, give me MORE!
...
Anyways, good start, look forward to reading the rest. The names, of course, are the hallmarks of a great read. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavor!
![[Image: Harlequinn-Copy2.png]](http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j130/dboy1612/Harlequinn-Copy2.png)