Apology to the Zoner Players

[Blodo]

One planet, really. Erie was taken by the Liberty government.

And Blunt, I realize I'm talking to a wall when talking to you but when those blanket bounties were posted, I was like, "so be it." What I WANTED was justification for it.
Another point that I read regarding Unioners. On FP2, they are allowed to land, fuel, get provisions and go. If you find the right rumors and read things, the Zoners sympathize with there cause but not their methods and asked them to take the criminal activities elsewhere. The same applies to the Xenos on the same base and Ames. It's not whining, it's a fact. You, Blunt, are cherry picking to build a false case because many lawfuls ALSO use those bases.

So, was asking for justification so wrong? I think not.

Don't say this has no correlation to the Unioner case, the Corsairs are clearly launching attacks out of Gran Canaria into Dublin, considering the obscene amount of Corsair NPCs in and around Omega-49, despite the fact that a Hessian - Corsair battleground is in the middle of the only route from Corsair space to Gran Canaria. So the Corsairs are fight Hessians, breaking through the blockade AND attacking Dublin from the deep Omega systems? I don't think so. Now I am not entirely sure by now just how well did the Bretonian government catch wind of this, but the moment they do the Bretonia - GC situation is going to be totally analogous to the Rheinland - FP2 debacle, with the only difference being the scale.

As for justification... neither of the Zoner bounties were endorsed by the Bretonian government in any way. What people graciously fail to notice is that QCP simply acted like unlawful mercs and took a bounty. How many in RP posts does the BAF need to make in order for you to realise that QCP actions at that moment were not endorsed? So for justification it's best if you turn to the original author of the bounty... as I remember the second one was posted for petty reasons, but reasons nonetheless. And for some people the money involved is reason enough.