• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 335 336 337 338 339 … 386 Next »
QCP| to separate from BAF|

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

QCP| to separate from BAF|
Offline pbrione
08-16-2009, 06:43 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 502
Threads: 41
Joined: Jun 2008

Well, I should probably clarify a couple of things. First of all, this does not neccessarily mean a great distancing in inRP relations, merely opens the door to one, due to the new freedom of the QCP to choose their own diplomacy. I don't beleive QCP have been "banned from shooting zoners"; they can still pirate Zoners and attack them inRP where situations demand it, just not focus on attacking Gran Canaria to the exlusion of pirating in Kusari. More conflicts will arise as, by their very nature, the Privateers exist to attack targets that the regular BAF cannot and what the QCP consider "harms Bretonia" is not neccessarily the same thing that the BAF considers to "harm Bretonia".

So, no, a great distancing in relations in not neccessary but is possible and for that reason certain steps such as QCP not docking on BAF bases are considered prudent. Plausable deniability is made easier if we don't keep supplying QCP with ships, for instance. Now, that's not "neccessary RP" in the sense that any RP is really neccessary, but it is RP that I have agreed with Blunt and unless I can be convinced otherwise by some very good RP reasons, it is RP that will stand.

Sir Stanley Nelson
[Image: kbeb.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg][Image: nsm.png][Image: gcak.jpg][Image: harvsu.png][Image: taui.png][Image: frcl.png]
[Image: BAF_1_FltAdm.jpg]
[Image: BAF_2.jpg]
[Image: BAF_3.jpg]
<span style="color:#000066">Charles Canning [Image: 1-2.png]</span><span style="color:#000066"> Foreign Secretary</span>
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
QCP| to separate from BAF| - by pbrione - 08-15-2009, 12:55 PM
QCP| to separate from BAF| - by Enko - 08-16-2009, 12:37 AM
QCP| to separate from BAF| - by pbrione - 08-16-2009, 06:43 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode