• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 520 521 522 523 524 … 547 Next »
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Class 9 gun analysis (take 2)
Offline sunergos
03-19-2007, 05:17 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-19-2007, 05:22 AM by sunergos.)
#23
Member
Posts: 45
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2006

' Wrote:I've used table made by sunergos to make my own table in Excel (that program is more familiar). Automated the process of calculating Hull/sec, Shield/sec, Power/sec, added INI rates (1/in-game rate, like in ini files), added INI weapon code, and a new system to calculate efficiency. My formula for efficiency is:

( (Hull/S) / (Power/S) ) * ( (600/Range) * (600/Speed) )

Let me explain.
( (Hull/S) / (Power/S) ) evaluate how energy efficient the weapon is. The more is this number, the better is efficiency. More damage, less power -> more efficient. Less damage, more power -> less efficient.

( (600/Range) * (600/Speed) ) is a value that calculates speed and range multiplier. "Normal" speed and range is 600. I compare speed and range of each weapon with 600 and get a value ranging from 0,8 to 1,5. This value is multiplied by power efficency.

should the formula for the velocity and range be inverted? For example, if you apply that formula to the solaris chain gun, it drops to the bottom of the chart... unless i've messed something up, which is totally possible. I would think that the damage over a greater range, at a highter velocity, should make it more efficient rather than less...

[Image: scra_cp_005.jpg]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by onca - 03-12-2007, 10:08 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Koolmo - 03-12-2007, 10:19 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Nightfall - 03-12-2007, 10:46 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Koolmo - 03-12-2007, 10:48 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Dab - 03-12-2007, 01:01 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by McNeo - 03-12-2007, 01:08 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Virus - 03-12-2007, 03:04 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by onca - 03-12-2007, 11:36 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Ascendancy - 03-13-2007, 05:18 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Igiss - 03-13-2007, 08:00 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by onca - 03-13-2007, 08:46 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-14-2007, 04:53 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 03-16-2007, 12:11 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by onca - 03-16-2007, 09:00 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Igiss - 03-16-2007, 09:44 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 03-16-2007, 12:08 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Igiss - 03-16-2007, 01:37 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-16-2007, 07:19 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by onca - 03-17-2007, 01:19 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-17-2007, 06:38 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Igiss - 03-17-2007, 06:19 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 03-18-2007, 05:24 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-19-2007, 05:17 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 03-19-2007, 05:50 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Igiss - 03-19-2007, 09:16 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Commodore - 03-20-2007, 12:08 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Akira Ishida - 03-20-2007, 04:49 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Commodore - 03-20-2007, 11:43 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-21-2007, 02:28 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by pchwang - 03-21-2007, 02:30 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Commodore - 03-21-2007, 02:51 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-21-2007, 04:45 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 03-22-2007, 01:32 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Dab - 03-22-2007, 04:14 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by kiggles - 03-24-2007, 06:05 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Sidewinder - 03-27-2007, 07:38 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 03-27-2007, 11:54 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by sunergos - 03-27-2007, 02:17 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Dab - 03-27-2007, 04:19 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by fwolf - 03-29-2007, 11:27 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 04-15-2007, 05:53 AM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Doom - 04-15-2007, 01:01 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Yngen - 04-15-2007, 05:53 PM
Class 9 gun analysis (take 2) - by Ascendancy - 04-16-2007, 11:23 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode