bomber balance

[frozen]

Whiner? Think it again before you write it next time.

actually, gabor is one of those guys who just about -never- bitches about anything, so your accusations and hostile tone toward him is rather uncalled for, nighthawk. Im not saying apologize, but rather, check your tone towards people. i could say the same thing about how the LR are bitching about the greyhound, but i wont, because not only do i choose to ignore posting flamy posts, i choose to maintain peace instead of egging on others.

@ joe:

i dunno. imo bombers should all become like barghests/fafnirs, get rid of light/mediums altogether, and leave fighters to do the anti bomber work. give bombers just 2 gun slots, 2 torps, cd, and mine. 2 gun slots for the shield busters, (remove hull buster guns for bombers altogether), have nova + supernova, cd, mines (this is where i suggest including a new type of anti cap mine. no movement, no tracking, massive damage, alot of health so they cant be blown up with cd spam (thus prevents bombers from being able to use them against fighters, and a medium explosion radius, 0 shield damage)

barghests/fafnirs work great against caps, but are rather bad against well flown fighters, which is how bombers should be moving towards.

@ looqas:

you use fighters to do anti fighter missions, you use bombers as anti cap. missions which have both, well assemble a fleet. outcasts/corsairs/order normally have enough players, both faction and indies, to make a fleet to do the missions together with.

---