Capital Ship Missiles

[Kane]

All right, step by step...

First off, 7 days for a singular flame seems harsh to me. Multiple, and continued, yes. But not one. Vlad has been warned, and if he does it again I will deal with him. Despite my intense dislike for your person, you have a point; it -is- my job to be fair and even-handed in my Moderation duties.

Secondly, I was being truthful in what I was reading from your posts. You didn't say it out loud, but that's what I imply and infer from your posting. If you want a different impression, you're going to have to work at it.

And thirdly, Wobbly, at what point in time did I ever say a single fighter against a battleship should be fair? A single fighter should die a horrible death against a battleship! Not instantly, a well piloted and agile fighter could dodge most lasers and missiles, but a single fighter should never carry enough firepower to take down, or even threaten, a battleship.

Bombers, on the other hand, are a different story. They have powerful shields and thick armor, because they have to survive the onslaught of a battleship and still be able to deliver a payload. One on one, a bomber should be a moderate threat. Where the bomber really comes in is durring fleet actions where the battleships are worried about other battleships and not the little gnats flying about. Untill said gnat drops two nuclear warheads into its lap. Again, one on one is not advisable. Two is a good number for taking on a battleship and having a good shot at victory, while three is fairly assured.

---

This is the real true story of rock and roll; it was not about anything more then, how to live your life, as a gangster, in sartorial splendor, and turning the world into a place where normality would never return again...- Malcolm McLaren