Sentient Machine Alliance

[Apex]

Excuse me but I am having a hard time find this as original work.

I see much here that looks like the information belonging to the Harvester Faction, starting with your begining history material and ending with a some what modified ship listing.

I can see that some have already seriously questioned your right to even use certain ships and I can not disagree with them in that. Even if you were the most advanced AI out there does not make you the most advanced Machines, which honeslty in my opinion, I do not see this as original or new.

I do not know why Harvester members have not spoken up yet, but I can bet good money that as soon as they do notice, they will have less than pleasent comments for your attempt to take their hard work and call it your own.

The way I look at it, I do not think this should be alowed at all.

Thank you for your concerns, I have already tried to explain things with Geisha and others have essentially chimed in onto whats basicly happened as well , so I'm not gonna repeat whats been stated in detail.

This posting as stated was meant to be here to deal with the issues surrouding the Formation of this Faction, what we are , whom we are and a basic outline of what we are attempting to do. All issue's ariseing and being mentioned are taken into consideration and are dealt with as promptly as possible.

This faction is based not on an orginal idea of our own , nor has it been stated as such, but of one already established with modifications. It is truely an Role playing extension to actual events, involveing former members of the Harvesters and some new seeking to take the original work to a different level of RP serverside.

If you would like further details as to why this and not start something entirely new, please feel free to PM me and I'll add a few more things into the fray, which simply dont need to be "Aired". Though honestly seeing your also a GC member as well as Geisha, you may know some of these details already or can aquire them from her.

Thanks again for your concerns,
APEX