Colonial Remnant ID

[Beagle23]

No, it's not theirs either, when it was 'given' to the mod it became part of Discovery.

Panzer, your RP and oorp points apply to pretty much every faction on this server, bar C, P, N. WHY is the CR exempt from the 'delight' of indies when all other factions have them?

"Simply NO. As faction leader of the CR I won't have fleet indies. Anyone pretending to be one will receive the aforementioned three choices. Period."

Admiral Hale can't say that. LoteK can't say that. Admiral Malexa can't say that. Why can you?

Isn't insisting that the faction enjoy the 'delight' of unchecked indies on the grounds that everyone else has to just a little spiteful? There's spit in my food, so you should have yours spat in too.

Ignoring the points regarding the size of the Colonial population, not being a vanilla military, and all the others that have been made, the main point in retaliation seems to be that because everybody else has to do it, so do they.

Wouldn't the forward-thinking person be happy that not all factions have such things forced upon them? Shouldn't this thread have the opposite intention, looking for ways to better manage indies for the current factions who have almost no control over them, instead of momentarily ignoring the problem for the benefit of the argument and insisting other factions are subjected to it as well?

As has been repeated many times in the thread, the CR are open to individual people interested in becoming indies but insist they have the final word on whether each case flies or not. Admiral Hale, LoteK and Admiral Malexa don't have that level of control; don't you think they'd like to? Don't you think those factions would be infinitely better represented if their indies took the polite step of presenting their intentions to the official faction for feedback, input, and approval?

That, however, is getting into a discussion that is for another thread, and not one I'm interested in creating. I merely write it to make clear my point; that I believe this thread is an argument of if we have to suffer, so do you. I don't think that kind of thinking helps either side, and I don't support it in any way, shape or form.