Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread

[Zeltak]

// You had the opportunity to respond to me in character and chose not to. Your loss.

Indeed and I already gave you an answer as to why I didn't respond in Role-Play. Nobody's loss except yours.

// What you're missing is that I said "I'm giving Liberty a chance to role play." I did NOT say "I'm giving Zeltak a chance to role play." There's quite a difference as to the subject and verb in that statement. I was speaking TO you ABOUT Liberty. Subject was Liberty and NOT Zeltak. If you don't understand basic grammar, I can't help you.

I'm afraid you are the one lacking knowledge of basic grammar. Clearly when you are writing exactly this:

// Well Zeltak ... I'm giving Liberty a chance to role play an event here. You can either play along or not. That's entirely up to you. If you say no. Fine ... then I guess you're limits of creativity have been reached.

You are in one way or another referring to me personally and insulting my level of creativity. You do not only mention by my forum handle (personally referring to me) but you are also stating "I guess YOU'RE..." (meaning me). Basic knowledge of the English language suggests a "personal attack".

// Either way, I don't see much role play beyond "Red is Dead" here. You justify an attack on me for one reason, I am red. You ignore ALL circumstances leading up to my vessel's destruction (which is role play) and concentrate on who and what I am (which is Red, Green or White on radar or ID). And it doesn't matter what I say because you've got the faction protection society at work here.

Completely false. I as well as any other [LN] member never go by the principle "Red is Dead". I justify an attack by this standard USUALLY:

My character spots a criminal under the act of illegal activity --> Fine and warrant for arrest. Criminal refuses demand --> Deadly force.

My character spots a criminal who is just "being around" --> Questioning, possible arrest due to the criminal belonging to known criminal group --> Criminal refuses demand --> Deadly force.

Of course exceptions can be made. For example just this other day an Xeno (who is "Red on scanners" - referring to your "Red is Dead" accusation - and hostile according to rep sheet) was not arrested nevertheless shoot upon because said pilot was not found doing anything illegal at all.

It's implied Zeltak. I give you negative feedback and you attack me because I provide it. You don't have to specifically SAY that you do not want it. Your disinterest in what I've said is enough. You know sometimes actions speak louder than words.

Erm sorry? I defended against your accusations on the [LN] which I found to be completely false. I have the right to do so, it does not in any shape or form imply that I do not wish to receive negative feedback. You are twisting this around to your interest.

Taking negative feedback and processing it internally (ie: taking it seriously) are two considerably different things. You may be able to "take" feedback. But can you "process it internally?"

I believe I'm handling your "negative feedback" rather well if you ask me. How people think of my performance is up to them. No point in arguing on that point.