Terrorist ID: Is it even needed?

[sovereign]

Do not make false assumptions about people if you don't want such interpretations to shine through then.
To be honest, the Wilde are the second best regarded exclusive faction in my eyes, beaten only by the SCRA. Most likely due to my lack of interaction with you, but meh.

<sarcasm> Why thanks, I'm sure that if I get to know you I'll learn that you're not a shining example of RP but rather a pvpwhoring tard too. </sarcasm>

I already gave something to address, something you completely ignored. In case you missed it, I will say it again: What role does the Terrorist ID allows to play that other IDs don't already?

I did miss it the first time, but then I found it and responded to it.

Cambridge event series. The BAF have an important artifact (The Sword in the Stone), Das Wilde is trying to take it. Direct force has failed, so Das Wilde asks the BAF to return it and avoid more bloodshed. The BAF say they'd rather have their people die than help us.

So we oblige. We send teams into Bretonian sovereign territory and kill everything that moves, saying that the killing will stop as soon as the BAF return to the negotiation table. The point is not to get anything from the traders. The point is to cause an incident with the Bretonian government and force them into acting. If we let the civilians weasel their way out, it would not have so much impact, and the brets could just say "it's your own fault for not paying them". This way, there is only one response, and it's the response we want.

THAT is terrorism. Killing innocents to get what you want from others.

Moving right along, no, you didn't say

"All Terrorists are pvpwhoring retards."

not in so many words, anyway, but when I see this-

I see something counter-productive and harmful to the roleplay environment, something that facilitates PvP whoring, double standards and bias and worst of all, I see it being admin-sponsored

-it kind of implies that you're calling me a pvpwhore, and saying that the very existence of my characters is harmful to the roleplay environment. I do take offense to that, unless you can show me something I'm doing that actually does harm the roleplay environment.

On the edit... How cute, making baseless accusations again. Unless you actually know me, you shut the **** up and don't go around baseless insults yourself.

The thing I edited in response to seeing was this:

PPS: I didn't give any suggestions in the situations I faced because I saw none. Talking about the Phantoms, as I presume you were, they "cornered" themselves into a RP in which it is very hard to do anything other than PvP whore. Or at least, so I would think taking from what I have experienced.

Sounds kind of like you saying that you presume I was a Phantom, and that the Phantom you presume I was was a pvp-whore, ergo you are presuming that I'm a pvpwhore.

Anyways, I see this thread de-railing really fast.

De-railing? No, it's exactly on the topic you started. If you don't like it, that's your right, maybe you should have pondered that before starting the thread.

---