Administrators: Special RP Requests.

[n00bl3t]

Well, I was thinking, which is never a good thing in the eyes of many, and I realised something.

What that something is, or was, depending on your reference frame, is irrelevant, but the result will be two quotes from a similar topic, accompanied by some text. (With this being some of the text, along with another bit.)

There is one Special RP sub-forum.

Within it, there are three further-sub forums.

One is called "Approved Requests", it is unlocked, visible and free for people to post in, and as the name suggests contains approved requests.

The second is called "Denied Requests", it is unlocked, visible and free for people to post in, and as the name suggests contains denied requests.

The third is called "Pending Requests", it is unlocked and visible, but not free for people to post in, and as the name suggests contains requests being reviewed for a decision.

When someone posts an SRP request, it goes into "Pending Requests".

I should mention the fact that in my proposed system, faction leaders are still the only ones that can post, however, they must name who they are posting for.

Now, I would like to know how this is spammed, or how the Administration would have to do astronomical book-keeping.

Another thing that should be mentioned is, sanction sub-forum rules apply.

That is, for example, posting something in the approved requests like "you are wrong, OoRP and do not deserve this" will get you in trouble. (However, posting something asking for a clarification of someone's actions in-game, or evidence that they no longer deserve the SRP will be allowed.)

In the denied requests, for example posting something like "you suck" or "you will never get it" will get you in trouble. (However, constructive criticism such as "this is what you need to do so that getting your request approved is more likely" will be allowed.)

I could type more and how this system works better than the current one, but I will respond to posts as they come along.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.