Capital Ship Realism

[n00bl3t]

Obviously not, as the abuses still continue to happen. If such rules exist, they're not fulfilling their role.
So this is what this is all about - you don't want to part with your independent cap ship and so you want to shut down any and all suggestions that may jeopardize your indiecap. It's a valid reason, and it's quite understandable - it even explains why you seem to be willing to ignore the problems.
One fighter (non bomber) vs one cruiser. Unless the cruiser is a complete moron or the fighter is most likely going to lose. The fighter, at best has a chance for a stalemate until someone gets tired and leaves.
As I said, a game with such a limited player capacity that mixes fighters and capital ships has inherent issues with capital/fighter ship compatibility. I happened to suggest a fighter friendly proposal since the Freelancer engine was built for fighter class ships.
That's an idea, but it's irrelevant to this discussion

They exist, but are not used. To get them used, perhaps either make reports to the relevant people, or STFU and stop asking for more rules and restrictions.

I make no secret of having a large amount of cruisers, almost every single cruiser anyone can buy. However, accusing me ignoring the non-existent problem is a good diversion from answering my post content. (Oh, and not all my capital ships are independents, but eh.)

So, you think it is in-RP for a fighter to fight a cruiser, one on one, instead of fleeing? Right. Please, let us come up with tangible situations. (However, yes, the fighter would win. Either by calling backup or the cruiser getting tired of consistently trying hit a target which it cannot hit.)

FL was also made for PVP, not RP. Perhaps get rid of RP too? *Facepalms.*

You made it relevant with your "I love caps too" statement. I suggested where your proposals of restrictions would be more appropriate.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.