Capital Ship Realism

[n00bl3t]

Rules are but another tool to add gameplay mechanics. It is a legitimate tool to fill in where the game code's limitations restrict mechanic implimentation.
So your argument is 'everyone but me is broken, therefore there is no problem.' This is not a legitimate insight.

You tried to flip it around on me, with the "your biased" card, and failed.
Perhaps you're good, or the guys you went up against aren't. The problem exists and is wide spread in other people - so congrats on your skills, let's fix it for everyone else who isn't exactly the red baron.
There shouldn't be a situation where a capital ship interdicts a small fighter period - this is part of the problem which this proposal addresses.
A fighter that is not dodging against cruiser fire is dead; a cruiser that is not dodging fighter fire has an itch to scratch on an undented shield - unless the cruiser pilot is either stupid, blind, or both - the fighter is either dead or in a stalemate. Choosing to flee means death - pvp death.
A must be B. C is like A. Therefore C must be B - this is a syllogism which is a logical fallacy.
Except, the purpose of this thread is to exclusively address this proposal. You seem rather intent to 'lol no' it and put in another completely different proposal instead - if it contributes insights into this proposal, it is welcome. If it does not concern this proposal, it is not - at least on this thread.

Refer to my part about fun, again.

No, but the attempted flip and consequential fail is appreciated. The point is, people who are not reporting abused capitals with appropriate evidence allow the abuse to propagate. Reporting them or teaching them to RP is the path to take here, not throwing in a thousand in-built limitations which restricts "fun" within the RP environment.

You need to learn to fly your ship. Try strafing, reverse thrusting, engine killing and so on. If you cannot dodge capital ship fire you are doing it wrong. Also, I am ANZLAG, and out of the hundreds of PVP sessions I have been in, there are only a handful or two which I have won.

No, there should not be. The fighter should flee, disallowing this situation to happen.

It is a game. You can die. It is in-RP for your fighter to flee.

Congratulations on listing out a logical fallacy. Now, explain how it applies to the situation, fully.

You seem to ignore that your proposal affects all areas. As long as you continue to do so, you fail. However, I do appreciate being compared to a "lolwut" by my "lol no" behaviour.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.