(THE MODEL DUMP)

[Taiko]

*nods in understanding*

As I said, I can understand a gradual evolution, not a sudden just from first gen prop driven planes to high end jets, and yes there are some things that are jumping too far from their roots in a single bound.

Having said that, I was asking more because some people (not meaning you specifically) are very much against any changes in style at all. I agree that a second gen ship should have many similarities to a first, a third to a second, and even a fourth to the third.

But after a development cycle that long, the fourth may not have much in common with the first anymore.

I'm not saying that these models are mind-blowing, or anything, but some of them, in my opinion, arn't bad, and with a little improvement could be used.

I should have named the model I liked more specifically, but that is my fault. I rather like the "battery" model, more because while it had no real predecessor it still looks like what it is, an ungainly transport.

Sure, a little streamlined for looks, but obviously NOT a combat vessel.

I am no pro by any means, but the textures don't look that bad to me, but again, this is in reference to the "Battery". The others arn't really my style anyway.

---