Tranports vs Caps

[Garuda]

I disagree.
This rule should stay.

At first, I don't want to see pirating Vidars / Stortas / Praefects / GRP Obstinates / Something alike. That's just not fair to trader.
IRP, that's huge resource abuse on...what, 2-3 millions and then getting blown up by a pair of Fafnirs? No, thanks.
After that, capital ships shouldn't be running after transports at all. Why doesn't battleship in California move for transports? Stationed, you'll say? It's as stationed as Spyglass is, for example. Or maybe let Isis chase your artifact smugglers?
Also, that makes whole server moving to caps. Nothing'd stop them now, becuase they can do most of stuff in caps. I believe rule was invented to make people flying fighters. Just expect now hunting packs, cruiser + BS.
Cruisers double-mortaring transports - that's another thing I'm not happy to see.

I loudly say "no".

EDIT:
Should you care about him? Your business is war, not interdicting smugglers. You can demand contraband in GB, be happy with that, actually. For smugglers you have escorts IRP.
Tell me what should Scylla do in the middle of Camridge? Especially with Armistance? :|
Because those cruisers are used as hideout. They're not even enough efficient in battles.

GB =/= Cruiser. Cruiser is far more powerfull, eats more resources and takes more effort to build. And cruisers have escorts IRP.

Molly Cruiser in Camridge really has nothing to do. Did you ever hear about Armistance? Mollys and BAF are neutral now.

Rheinland Pirat Cruiser.

Of all Rheinland pirate groups, only Red Hessians are capable of building cruisers of their own. Bundschuh, Unioners, and LWB don't build capital ships, but sometimes have a chance to buy - or steal - Red Hessian cruisers of older modifications, or even newer models that were crippled in battle. Having weaker hull and less firepower than new Hessian cruisers, these ships are still usable for defending pirate bases and <strike>attacking Rheinland Military convoys.</strike> Not possible.

I voted for yes.