Couple of questions...

[Krenshaw]

Greetings again,

Well, I am fresh from my finals and ready to return to the game =D. I would like to apologize for my extended absence but this real life thing keeps getting in the way ;D.

I am not whining, I am simply trying to find a fair compromise within the rules/a definite ruling on what can and can't be done. I am not saying smuggling should be easy, I am saying that it shouldn't be allowed for a faction which is supposed to be patrolling and guarding three(or is it four?) systems, to instead be staying in Texas waiting for traders. Staying Texas only when I am logged on my trader. Only when someone who they know is smuggling do the SA congregate in Texas. That isn't a blockade, that is an ambush of questionable legitimacy. This is one of the questions in the original post, just a matter of can they do this?

They(SA) even go as far as sitting in Puerto Rico, waiting for a return trip, or for us to leave Texas, then opens fire without a second thought. I can understand following us but this individual camped the Texas jump hole(in Puerto Rico). This individual was there, in the Junker Guard system, before I ever left Texas or my partner ever left Humboldt.

I applaud those who have presented counter arguments in this debate, but I cannot ignore the pointed arguments of Prontera.

To AdmSirRed and any others not willing to read the entire post: A better opinion could be formed if you took the time to read the lengthy, but worthwhile arguments and gloss over the flame posts. Case in point: Harlequinn's second post compared to Razr's post.

On another lets avoid the flames please, after all cooler heads will prevail.

Thank you for your time,
Krenshaw

PS:

And now about cruisers/battleships... DON'T SMUGGLE WHEN A BATTLESHIP IS ON!!

However; what you neglect to see is that when only a battleship is defending/ambushing, is that there are great profits to be had in this situation.