• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 515 516 517 518 519 … 547 Next »
HF MK IIs?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do we need Heavy Fighter MK IIs?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes!
43.18%
19 43.18%
Nope.
27.27%
12 27.27%
We just need to balance the current Heavy Fighters, not make Heavy Fighter MK IIs.
29.55%
13 29.55%
Total 44 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

HF MK IIs?
Offline Snip3rNife
07-06-2007, 06:48 AM,
#47
Member
Posts: 212
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2007

Yeah. Some balance would be nice.

However, with the current setup, it allows people to simply work their way up until they get a good ship. My Kusari State Police account, for example, started out with a Starflier, once I got the cash I got a Drake, and then after that I got a Wyrm.

However, what I don't like is how the weaker ships, LFs and HFs, aren't balanced anyway. The Liberty ones are weak, and the Rheinland ones are almost as strong as the LF MK IIs and VHFs. If anything were to be fixed, it would have to be that.

5 main classes of fighters should do:
"Starflier" is the basic ship you start out with. Just like usual. Leave it crappy and underbalanced. Though that is a little unorthodox.
LF MK Is should have good manoeuvrability but are weak and have low power. Small cargo hold.
LF MK IIs should have slightly less manoeuvrability for more power output and armour. Medium-small cargo hold.
HFs should have decent manoeuvrability with even more power and armour, and more weapon slots. Medium cargo hold.
VHFs should have poor manoeuvrability with extra power output and armour. Medium-large cargo hold.

The differences in armour and power shouldn't be that great (with the exception of the Starflier), but the equipment level range should be separated by one level for each.
"NEXUS Wrote:Class 1 weapons become equal to the current Class 5
Class 2 is equal to Class 6
Class 3 is equal to Class 7
Class 4 is equal to Class 8
Class 5 is equal to Class 9
Class 6 is equal to Class 10
Class 7 and above are Capship level forward weapons

Kinda of like how the Turrets are now setup.
Using Nexus's setup:
The Starflier use Class 2-3,
LF MK Is use 3-4,
LF MK IIs and HFs use 4-5
VHFs use 5-6.
Gunboats use 7-8 (7 being low damage but efficient, 8 being high damage but inefficient).
Cruisers/Destroyers use 9.
Battleships use 10, although I've never seen a Battleship that can use a forward gun.

But, are the mod creators up to it? I doubt it highly.

Theres my two Sirius Cents. (Wow, if I say that one more time it can become my catch phrase)

[Image: snip3rvolbeat.png]
Known as on Discovery RP 24/7:
Thomas_Hill - Train
[KNF]TakajiKimura - Chimera
You may also know me elsewhere as I'll Begin or something including "Volbeat"
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-27-2007, 02:44 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Lt.Cmdr.Olsav - 06-27-2007, 03:05 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Lt.Cmdr.Olsav - 06-27-2007, 03:10 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-27-2007, 03:42 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Yngen - 06-27-2007, 04:07 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-27-2007, 05:59 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-28-2007, 12:20 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 06-28-2007, 12:57 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-28-2007, 01:01 AM
HF MK IIs? - by TankTarget - 06-28-2007, 05:13 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Gamazson - 06-28-2007, 06:48 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Gamazson - 06-28-2007, 07:12 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Maranzo - 06-28-2007, 07:18 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Gamazson - 06-28-2007, 08:02 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-28-2007, 09:43 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 06-28-2007, 10:05 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Yngen - 06-28-2007, 11:37 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-28-2007, 12:00 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Lt.Cmdr.Olsav - 06-28-2007, 01:31 PM
HF MK IIs? - by darkguardian - 06-28-2007, 06:42 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 06-28-2007, 06:53 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Gamazson - 06-28-2007, 08:00 PM
HF MK IIs? - by TankTarget - 06-28-2007, 08:16 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-29-2007, 02:21 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 06-29-2007, 02:48 AM
HF MK IIs? - by TankTarget - 06-29-2007, 03:57 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 06-29-2007, 10:13 AM
HF MK IIs? - by TankTarget - 06-29-2007, 04:44 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-30-2007, 08:16 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 06-30-2007, 10:40 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Nightfall - 06-30-2007, 11:01 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 06-30-2007, 11:32 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 07-01-2007, 12:19 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Panzer - 07-01-2007, 12:30 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 07-01-2007, 12:50 AM
HF MK IIs? - by TankTarget - 07-01-2007, 04:41 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 07-03-2007, 07:48 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Guest - 07-03-2007, 07:54 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 07-03-2007, 08:29 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 07-03-2007, 09:39 PM
HF MK IIs? - by Vaporlinx - 07-04-2007, 01:01 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 07-04-2007, 01:27 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 07-04-2007, 01:28 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Qunitinius~Verginix - 07-04-2007, 01:37 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Denelo - 07-04-2007, 01:38 AM
HF MK IIs? - by BestFlyerHere - 07-04-2007, 02:19 AM
HF MK IIs? - by Snip3rNife - 07-06-2007, 06:48 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode