Logical balance

[Govedo13]

I just want to give some other options
Ammo based EMP missiles- gunboat statswise but with much better speed and turning rate- they must hit. but no hull dmg 13k shield dmg, 2k effective range.- 50k credits at unit. The Capital ships pilots will not be able to argue about not having the option to fight bombers- it will make the bombers hull clean for Battleship guns. Experienced battleship pilots will be able to missile/razor bomber and instant kill him. When the missiles are ammo based they and expensive to buy they will not be spammed- 40 shots for example is not that much.
With this missiles the bombers will loose energy and will not be able to use the snac so often. With EMP missiles escorts will eat the bomber hulls not the bombers shield.You will say that the bombers will shield run well they shield run now so the difference will not be so huge.

Nerf the SNAC hitpoints- add nice light fighter only missile( Light fighter torpedo slot) with less damage lets say 1000 dmg but equal to cd as speed and turning- limit the ammo to 5 shots- sub-target,shoot make the snac to go kaboom with 3 shots. Bomber without SNAC is useless....It cannot be abused in fighter to fighter to fighter fights.
Lobster Fanfir is way too big- I have shoot it in P-transp several times.If two fighters cannot kill freighter sized bomber when he shoot battleship then this people are very bad fighter pilots. And I dare you to test again without the 2 fighters behind you - single bomber even the most heavy one cannot took down battleship shield.The battleship regen will prevent you do to any hull dmg.

---

€œ

Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)