' Wrote:Kusari lost all major battles, which means there were at least a few major battles between Kusari and Gallia. That is not one. Also, they didnt accept the first attempt at peace.
And I really dont want to have to explain the end of WWII in the Pacific to you, but since I am a history guy, I cant pass up the chance.
The Japanese surrender to the Americans in Tokyo bay was the result of several factors, the most notable of which was the US dropping the A-bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Other factors were the Soviet invasion of Manchuria, as well as the fact that the United States had taken islands in the Pacific, putting US land based bombers within range of the Japanese main Islands. While Japan was in bad shape, the neither the United States nor the Soviet Union, nor for that matter the Chinese were in a position to easily take the Japanese main islands. Modern estimates suggest that it would have taken at least 1 million US troops to invade Japan, with death tolls estimated to be in the range of 300,000. This was why the A-bomb was used, a show of unmatchable power.... much like the Gallic advance into the Taus. Anyway, I am not sure what a discussion of the end of World War Two has to do with this, but there is your explanation.
Yeah, that was a rhetorical question, I'm a history guy myself. Military history to be specific.
It took not one, but TWO nukes to get the Japanese to surrender, and with Kusari being based on Japan. Then why would they give up so easily?
And how is tau-31 classed as more than one batlle?