Freeport 9

[Jinx]

when a faction is determined to roleplay to destroy something - and does everything possible to do so...

and the attacked faction ultimately agrees - there is no one to disagree with the destruction.

if the destruction of a place was not wanted in the first place - why has there been an attack RPed as the destruction. when i want to RP to destroy something - i must be ready to have it destroyed actually.


i cannot RP to destroy something and be surprised when its destroyed. the problem with one sided roleplay is - that without coordination - the other side must make decisions, too - and usually one sided, too.


from a devs point of view - deleting a vital vanilla freeport isn t a good thing.... but then.... we let the RP happen that blows it up.... so i wonder, why do we let it happen and not step in - when we don t want it to happen? ( someone that might be able to interfere with such things could have been a gamemaster - a function missing on disco )

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC