AI ID

[Knjaz]

Any group that pirates a trader qualifies. So ID wise. HAckers/pirates/cast/sairs/rogues/mollys/gaians/Hogoshu/hessies/bundies and so on. But they should be pirating at the time. So going into say Alpha and attacking the casts claiming they are pirates is just fail.

Wrong. If you do not agree, then corsairs can't shoot non-pirating outcasts, and outcasts can't shoot non-pirating corsairs. Just look at the IDs.

"Can engage pirates and terrorists within certain circumstances" means, that you can blow up unlawful ID'ed players in these certain circumstances, unless the 6.6, 6.7 rules come into play.

Did that really require confirmation? Disco has these lines in IDs for how long exactly? Definitely longer then I stay here



What would be interesting - does it has any relevance to Order? Order are lawfuls, or quasi-lawfuls, afaik. No matter how their enemies portray them inRP.

Oh yes I'm trolling because I am spewing some logic that breaks down into RP 101.

If you had not noticed:
You consider a outcast flying a transport carrying goods back to Malta to be a pirate? Right that sounds logical, I'm sure he fires frozen food at his targets. How about a battleship captain? Because pirates really can afford battleships, and server rules allow that. Look over the ID again, the role of trader is intentionally blended in. They are not pirates until they commit a act of piracy, this does not by any means mean that they cant be hunted for simply being Outcasts.

Too much wrong in it.
The line "Can engage pirates, terrorists and lawfulls in their ZoI" does not overwrite rules 6.6 and 6.7.


I think you should distinguish between "lawful and unlawful" things in the eyes of certain group/faction, and rule-wise.
Although it's indeed sometimes unclear, but definitely not in this case.