How a player faction excludes a characteristic of the NPC faction

[casero]

Samura docking in crete.
SOB "NAP" with BAF.
MR in peace with Bret Lawfuls.
OCs threating the LRs.
bd working with Privateers and outcasts (in the past)
Zoners allying with SCRA (or maybe allying is not the perfect word for it, common enemy like it more?).
KNF and Corsairs shooting BAF.
BAF and Outcasts shooting KNF.

What I meant for double standards is that one person said that the corsairs didn't assume their weakness and powergamed a way out of it, and saying that the other factions have to live with their weakness, however, the outcast weakness (just as an example, as for being the corsairs biggest enemy) is the adiction to cardamine, and sticking to it.

While the "weakness" of one faction depends on no one but themselves, the other faction is forced to depend on zoners, and when they found a way out of depending from zoners, people claimed powergaming and said they must stick to their lore. That's the double standard.

And adding to that, not all the zoners are at war with the corsairs, and that the zoners weren't the only ones providing food to the corsairs (Junkers if I'm right), but still Corsairs are powergamers.

No, I'm not accusing the Outcasts of doing something wrong, I'm saying that FOR ME, their weakness is not comparable to the Corsairs' weakness, and that the corsairs didn't get away from their lore, they just cutted one of their providers off the game. (Same as the Outcasts did once with the Liberty Rogues, if I'm not wrong).