• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 … 2176 Next »
To: Junker Congress

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Core Dominance - 7 / 10,000
Humanity's Defiance - 79 / 10,000
Nomad Ascendancy - 38 / 10,000
Order Mastery - 10 / 10,000

Latest activity

To: Junker Congress
Offline Darkard
12-05-2010, 06:43 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 278
Threads: 21
Joined: Oct 2008

[Image: sig1-1.jpg]

Sir Howe,

I must say that the Armed forces were much more accomodating in thier discussions with us in the "First Request" that you mention.

Regardless, you come to us now as if we have not done as was asked in those Requests. Of the ships mentioned in those requests can you provided evidence of thier repeat offences of dock on our bases?
We can only work on the names we are given. Which in this recent evidence is an entirely new one which we are unaware of.
We could of cource enact a ban on all ships with an IFF of "The" but that would be rather silly as I would also be banning myself while flying .:j:.The.Opportunity.

Now then. We cannot enforce docking laws if our own guardsmen are going to be shotdown by the Authoritys. So I do request that this Ban of Junker vessels be lifted so that we can acctualy enact the demand you make.
Also, if you can procure evidence of the Indians working alongside Hogosha ships we would be VERY happy to see that.

Sir Howe, if you knew the Junkers, and I'm sure your inteligence services make sure you do. You would know that we would never wish harm upon civilians. In the long run we Junkers are all civilians, we are hardly a military outfit would you not agree? Would you also not agree that the previous requests were not dealt with swiftly?

Grant us our freedom again and we will cooperate as we always have done.
We can also resume our Scrap Mining operations in NL, the labours of this are being delivered to the BPA for them to have convicts bash into your new ship parts and munitions.
Please see the attached image to see the scale of the opperation your ban is halting right now.

[Image: screen14-1.png]

McMillan Out

+++ Transmission Ends +++

' Wrote:0-499 posts: Your posts will be completely and utterly ignored.
500-999 posts: People will read your posts, but will never care for the content.
1000-2000 posts: Your posts will be read, your points may be considered, if you're lucky.
2001+ posts and custom title: Your opinion matters.
<div align="right">QFT</div>
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 05:15 PM
To: Junker Congress - by JunkerTown - 12-05-2010, 06:04 PM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 06:22 PM
To: Junker Congress - by NOVA-5 - 12-05-2010, 06:33 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Snoozzzer - 12-05-2010, 06:36 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Darkard - 12-05-2010, 06:43 PM
To: Junker Congress - by blubba - 12-05-2010, 07:10 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-05-2010, 07:18 PM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 08:16 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-05-2010, 08:26 PM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 09:04 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-05-2010, 09:58 PM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 10:37 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-05-2010, 10:46 PM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-05-2010, 10:54 PM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-06-2010, 12:36 AM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-06-2010, 01:01 AM
To: Junker Congress - by Hawk - 12-06-2010, 02:13 AM
To: Junker Congress - by BAF Admiralty Board - 12-06-2010, 02:18 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode