• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Communication Channel
« Previous 1 … 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 … 2187 Next »
Communique to A. Atris of GAUL

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Communique to A. Atris of GAUL
Offline Misane
02-06-2011, 11:06 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 91
Threads: 12
Joined: Oct 2010

****Encryption High****


From Adam Atris

To Alexander du Lac

General, i'll make it quick, point by point:

Firstly, I'm not sure exactly how you believe yourself to be in a position to hack a secure channel, believe me, I take a dim view of this - at the very best it is exceptionally rude, at the very worst it is a deliberate attempt to break the Councils communication codes. In short. Keep your responses OUT of message channels not addressed to you.

Accept my apologies, it seems there was a mistake, i shouldn't have received this message and shouldn't have answered directly, but what i read shocked me(//actually this is really a mistake, i can delete it if you want, pm me).

Do you honestly thing war ships make a suitable diplomatic envoy?

Again: no, no, no and no. I already answered , a BS is the last possible choice for diplomatic visits.

I already answered, the reports i have show clearly that the officers made one mistake: acting in precipitation.
They tried to atenuate the consequence, to accept it with humility , but were taken in a trap.
You know very well our Redemption or Obstinate usually NEVER leave Gallia except for ONE reason i won't expose here. Once again, you look surprisingly closed...



What kind of leader am I to trust my allies?....an odd question, seeing as you list no supposed allies of mine, and your constant referral to these 'allies' misdeeds without proof is both lazy and reckless


we are your allies too, despite of that you want Evidences ? There is a paradox but very well, as you're too lazy to just talk to them by yourself, and as what i saw or heard makes no importance to you i'll have to record any conversation i have and report it to you now ?

No doubt had I promised a full investigation in the message to the Gaians, you would be complaining that I am overstepping my authority by demanding your report and evidence.....

This is why i systematically warned you - or at least tried to - about all strange incursions, contact or whatever we noticed ? Where is the logic ?
By the way, i never had Half an answer about the Order BS incursion, although you had evidences. I even contacted you when you were in Languedoc, while the BS was still here, both of you dispeared at the same time on Long range scan... We never choosed to act alone even if we have specificities, but Face it: we're almost an insult to you. What comes from us has from the first minute been seen as a kind of provocation,


I have no idea what 'branch' I have locked - I assume you refer to yourselves....if so, I fail to see how I have 'locked' it - I have denied you nothing and in no way sought to limit your activities.

this is unbearable and unworthy coming from a General, how can you expect a single minute we can keep on talking ?
By giving no credit to any of our reports, by giving no answers to our questions, what do you as a leader think you made ?


Your next point I'm afraid is beyond my comprehension M'sieur....as far as I am aware no Sirian 'reinforcements' have been joining the Council - they have their own equally pressing concerns it would seem.

I already discussed this point, Whenever you Lord Alexander du Lac will consent descending from the sky to meet us, poor and blind sinners, I'll introduce you to the two captains. I can introduce you to Ens Dayson too, a sirian who joined the council.

But we both know this won't happen, for you don't want that. Even your message is just an instrument, to display an attitude. We are just used as rewarding tools...Well at least we're suddenly usefull, let's see the good side of things.


It is obvious i have no credibility nor value to you and, to be honest Alexandre *he insists on the Gallic way of pronunciation*, since a few minutes, i can live with that very well.

But if this accident harms the council or if you consider the relation with the gaians is so important that it requires repairs, be sure i am willing to face the consequences of our mistake. You are not responsible for this tragic accident, we are, you don't have to suffer from that.
As you relationship with Gaians is far better than mine now, let me know when you judge the good moment for me to contact them.



Cordialement,

Adam Atris


***Comm Closed***
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Communique to A. Atris of GAUL - by Veyron - 02-06-2011, 09:25 PM
Communique to A. Atris of GAUL - by Misane - 02-06-2011, 11:06 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode