[Old Archive] Information & Feedback

[FallenKnight]

Your "colorful" chaos of words, shows clearly what a mess it was from your side of view. Which is ofcourse totaly wrong.

Maybe you've missed my point of "A single templar been engaged by an indie destroyer" ?
Everyone is whining about none known HMS indies, that are just 60% miners...and usually these indies got obliterated, sometimes even form BAF forces (if they really deserve it).
The point of my entire note, is not to see your point of view, or to ask you, did you had fun ganking...my note is a question to your Commanders, will they do this in future or not. A simple Yes or No will do it and belive me, will be enough. I dont want to hear funny stories from evryone's point of view...

About your colorful words, and point of view, you made me smile when said "I knew more hostiles will come". First I didnt called for any support, even when yamator arrived. I was there alone and doing my best, so "more enemies will come" would not happen. Well, I dont know what can a Templar with half reagents, a Convoy "gunboat" , I repeat, "Bretonia Gunboat" ,( Did I said BRETONIA gunboat), and me ...can do against two destroyers and one battleship. Before Yamator arrived, I knew it was allready a mess. That Indie wanted to lure us in Stokes, and it had to be punished for even attacking a BAF| like that in coldblood.

From then , you arrived on the "picture", so just because you missed 50% of the entire conflict doesnt allow you to fully understand the entire situation.

And dont tell me you was not going to open fire on me. From your point of view it could be a Battleship against a destroyer right? But from my point of view it was a templar vs destroyer. None of us had in mind to assault Stokes and the future battle, that I heard was a failure ...

(So to stop the spamming of this channel or future missunderstandings , I want only high ranked members to speak and say if they are gona do something about the Future situations)

---

Discovery Bridges[Feedback] Baron Piett[Biography]