I am aware that there is some sort of appeal process of an complaint that never went to any trial or mediation. However the Liberty Security Forces have assumed no fault in the manners of enforcing the Terrorist/Pirate Sedition Act. And were acting under their official capacity. Thus forth there is no civil action that can be taken against an agreement by the civilian body for their protection. The Republic agreed that certain measures of security were needed and that some rights- in order to live freer from danger, must surrender various liberties.
However this wasn't the case with this complaint. This complaint is about a Bomber Class vessel piloted by a intoxicated pilot and for fear of the civilian public and the military forces was forced to forfeit his vessel after an confrontation by volunteering to summit to Liberty Security Forces in their attempt to arrest said pilot.
That pilot being, Nuuskamuikkunen.
The Liberty Security Forces has operated to deter this pilot from flying military grade vessels, bar the lax definition of a civilian vessel, while proving that he is a risk to the public and military alike. This has no connection to the Liberty Navy event. Thus so the Liberty Security Forces motion to revoke Nuuskamuikkunen flying rights of anything that is an higher license grade vessel such as a bomber. Also there is an active warrant against Nuuskamuikkunen for his flight records to be turned over willingly to the LSF which he has not produced anything.
Thus so the Liberty Security Forces wish to motion this claim as a waste of valuables human resources. The Liberty Government is not a endless bank to give out to people who choose to put themselves at risks. IC, IND are perfect insurance companies that can reimburse this Liberty Civilian for his losses that could have been avoided.
With that you will not find any more Liberty Security Forces memo's motions or requests in this Civilian complaint that is unfounded and has no base.
![[Image: CrlBx.gif]](http://i.imgur.com/CrlBx.gif)