1 Faction per ID rule

[Daedric]

you will be surprised how many share my view. and why don't you comment on my other 3 arguments?

i quote them again
do you really want to have 10 official zoner/zoner-like factions for every npc faction?
it would end bad, and then the same rule for 1 faction/ID would be brought back, if this rule will actually be removed (which is very unlikely)

you have valid points, but you have to see that the current system has more advantages than the old one.

I wouldn't be surprised how many share your view. This is a large community, there are many different views. I was merely pointing out the inaccuracy of your statement about many of the people who voted to have it removed merely wanting it removed because they want their own official faction, as many of the people voting to remove it already have an official faction they control, ie they are a official faction leader.

I didn't comment on your other three arguments because in part they are valid. For the administration having 1 faction per ID does create less stress on them. It is true that unofficial factions can operate beside officials, I am a big supporter of that. As for preventing ooRP conflicts? That is incorrect, it causes as many ooRP conflicts as it prevents. Remember the two Council factions? That was a ooRP mess.

All in all the rule has both disadvantages and advantages. I'm of the opinion the disadvantages out weight the advantages and you are of the opposite opinion. Really it depends on which side the admins are sitting as it affects them the most as they have to wade into the issues having or not having the rule causes.

---

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide

Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide

OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback