1 Faction per ID rule

[Daedric]

OK, I think my original point has gotten a bit blurry. Let me clear that up. A price war is perfectly RP. However, my point is that the fact that a price war has started for purely OORP reasons is not alright and demonstrates potential issues with the 1 faction per ID rule. If there had been any sort of RP around this price war, I would be more than okay with it, but as it stands the group has created such an OORP conflict to increase faction activity. I am not okay with it. Telling me to stop whining does not make any sense, my complaint is legitimate, and it's a perfect example against the 1 faction per ID rule.

Your complaint is legitimate in your mind, because you feel you've been wronged. Your complaint has nothing to do with the 1 faction per ID rule.

The war between the GMG and Kusari was purely done to boost the GMG's activity too. The role play behind it made sense. Same thing here; so there is nothing wrong about it.

How does this issue demonstrate an issue with this rule? Go ahead, enlighten us.

Edit: I'll state again, that I'm fully for removing the rule myself. Just don't see how your QQ has anything to do with the rule.

Edit 2: Claiming there is no role play around the price war is a lie. Not all role play happens on the forums. I'd bet the Congress noticed you selling scrap in game, and then started a price war in game. Guess what? That is role play. They do not need to come to the forum to justify it. You, yourself are one of the most vocal supporters of people not having to come to the forum, yet you demand they do so in this case?

---

Helpful Discovery Guides

Get Help Here! | Player Base Guide | Mining Guide | Trading Guide

Reputation Guide | Zoner Rep Guide

OSI Information | Join OSI! | Nichols Trade Center
OSI Bounty Board | OSI Feedback