I think this rule needs to be fixed.
You are deemed guilty and not allowed to defend
yourself untill the 48 hours has passed, and as Nooblet
mentioned, by then it looks like your spouting sour grapes.
I would cop a sanction or ban on the chin no problems , when its deserved.
But the fact some mod interprets what i write to be bannable,
when it infact is the total opposite of what he interprets, demands anyone
in this situation to be able to ask why b4 the 48 hours is up.
Also if i said Makc RU's work was not professional i could understand, but i didnt.
I said my work would be of a professional quality and this was due to the credits involved.
And at this time there was a heated discussion of what sigs were worth
and the quality of work . So i stated that my effort would be professional and worth it.
Now this shows that a ban happy mod needs to know both sides of the story,
before he goes off his own interpretations. And to do this you need to be able to
post to explain the other side of the story.
