• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 288 289 290 291 292 … 392 Next »
NSTO

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

NSTO
Offline Vasuv
06-21-2011, 04:43 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 360
Threads: 52
Joined: May 2010

' Wrote:Ya'll shut up now.
The reference to NATO is misleading.

From the looks of its diplomacy and function it is quite literally an anti-Outcast group.

It retcons Bretonia into being hostile towards them, despite independent motions to have ceasefires and limited cardamine use.

As it stands, Igiss' scenario provides zero room for inter-house cooperation on a scale larger than bilateral agreements. Polarization makes it impossible. Plus, a NATO-like organization utilizes military units still under the overall command of the member nations; they aren't an additional fleet, but segments of existing ones on rotation. They should not have forces as an independent entity; no treaty in the history of the world, to my knowledge, ever made provisions for such a thing.

The idea sounds neat but it does not appear applicable. The randomness of the equipment lists, the extremely narrow target range, and forcing the hands of otherwise independent factions simply doesn't fit. Thumbs down, sorry buddy.

They should not have forces as an independent entity; no treaty in the history of the world, to my knowledge, ever made provisions for such a thing.

QUOTE
now there will be such a thing


UPDATED & NEW HISTORY ADDED WHICH DO YOU THINK IS MORE GOOD
  Reply  


Messages In This Thread
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-15-2011, 05:36 PM
NSTO - by Athenian - 06-15-2011, 09:04 PM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-20-2011, 04:20 PM
NSTO - by Petitioner - 06-20-2011, 11:56 PM
NSTO - by Zelot - 06-21-2011, 12:01 AM
NSTO - by Chenzo- - 06-21-2011, 12:14 AM
NSTO - by Dennis Jameson - 06-21-2011, 12:17 AM
NSTO - by Silver - 06-21-2011, 12:27 AM
NSTO - by Petitioner - 06-21-2011, 01:43 AM
NSTO - by Fletcher - 06-21-2011, 02:01 AM
NSTO - by Patrician - 06-21-2011, 02:13 AM
NSTO - by Dennis Jameson - 06-21-2011, 02:55 AM
NSTO - by Daedric - 06-21-2011, 03:17 AM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-21-2011, 06:01 AM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-21-2011, 06:07 AM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-21-2011, 06:25 AM
NSTO - by Petitioner - 06-21-2011, 07:11 AM
NSTO - by Zelot - 06-21-2011, 07:13 AM
NSTO - by Panzer - 06-21-2011, 07:22 AM
NSTO - by Vogel - 06-21-2011, 07:25 AM
NSTO - by Ryummel - 06-21-2011, 08:10 AM
NSTO - by Echo 7-7 - 06-21-2011, 11:22 AM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-21-2011, 04:43 PM
NSTO - by Ceoran - 06-22-2011, 09:35 PM
NSTO - by Vasuv - 06-23-2011, 08:41 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode