• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 28 Next »
New Coalition Shipline

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (16): « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 16 Next »
Thread Closed 
New Coalition Shipline
Offline Politus
06-24-2010, 12:51 AM,
#111
Member
Posts: 843
Threads: 47
Joined: Jan 2008

I concur with the above two posts.

Anyway, I still think that any Coalition ship which is a throwback to the Starlancer originals is a step in the right direction.:D

"Things will not calm down, Daniel Jackson. They will, in fact, calm up."
Offline Hidamari
06-24-2010, 01:59 AM,
#112
Member
Posts: 2,100
Threads: 217
Joined: Jul 2009

I like the coalition ships that already exist, and after watching and recording them fight using the tech they alreay have... they really dont need these ships. they do just fine without them.

[Image: RKaqSve.png]
Offline bluntpencil2001
06-24-2010, 02:01 AM,
#113
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:I like the coalition ships that already exist, and after watching and recording them fight using the tech they alreay have... they really dont need these ships. they do just fine without them.
You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots. You can make up for shoddy equipment with a lot of practice, but against an opponent of equal skill and normal equipment, you're toast.

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
 
Offline arvg
06-24-2010, 02:03 AM,
#114
Member
Posts: 3,207
Threads: 315
Joined: Sep 2009

You should try piloting one. Then you will understand.

[Image: 5438_s.png]
 
Offline Sprolf
06-24-2010, 02:20 AM,
#115
Member
Posts: 3,052
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots.

This was pretty much the case.
Those were our aces...

 
Offline Dennis Jameson
06-24-2010, 07:20 AM,
#116
Member
Posts: 1,392
Threads: 21
Joined: May 2008

' Wrote:thinly veiled sarcasm will be returned in kind. It's a ship introduction for the models, NOT a balance thread. This is now either the second or third time you've been told this in this thread Mr. Jameson, so either comprehend or just flat get booted.

Thank you and have a nice day.

Why, I'm speaking of the model itself, not the stat balancing that will be done at a later date... Or perhaps you just enjoy falling back on "no u" arguments combined with threats of application of your moderator powers just because you don't enjoy that somebody dares to ask questions of this nature.

As an alternative: Why not just answer the question? Why doesn't the Insurgent have an undercarriage like the Sabre in order to make it more like a very heavy fighter and less than a Kusari fighter?

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici

10/6
 
Offline Altaris
06-24-2010, 07:45 AM,
#117
Member
Posts: 780
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2008

' Wrote:You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots. You can make up for shoddy equipment with a lot of practice, but against an opponent of equal skill and normal equipment, you're toast.

PvP factor. Nothing else. I have nothing against these new models. But exchanging the current ones just because "they suck in PvP" isnt really rellevant reason.

[Image: 101st-banner-captain.png]
Carnage itself flying within void...
Proud cardihead ever since 2008...
You all gonna eat cardi!
...also im a troll, so hate me.
 
Offline Curios
06-24-2010, 07:48 AM,
#118
Member
Posts: 2,719
Threads: 88
Joined: Sep 2009

Using that reason i demanding new model for Pretorian, legate and imperator gunboat [Image: emoticon-0176-smoke.gif]

[Image: bhglogo.png]
Offline Turkish
06-24-2010, 07:49 AM,
#119
Member
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2007

' Wrote:PvP factor. Nothing else. I have nothing against these new models. But exchanging the current ones just because "they suck in PvP" isnt really rellevant reason.

It isn't that they suck, it's that there isn't a way to positively balance them. Hitbox and model issues makes giving them any advantage a seriously difficult task.

Fly a Partisan for an hour or two, you'll see what I mean.

[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]

I have a fetish for all things Norse.
 
Offline Curios
06-24-2010, 07:50 AM,
#120
Member
Posts: 2,719
Threads: 88
Joined: Sep 2009

Giv one to my merc plox, we'll see how it works.

[Image: bhglogo.png]
Pages (16): « Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 16 Next »
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode