• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 163 164 165 166 167 … 779 Next »
Player Bases Idea

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Player Bases Idea
Offline SummerMcLovin
08-04-2013, 01:50 PM,
#11
Former Admin
Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

Seems a very arbitrary way to do it to be honest. You'd likely need to instate some kind of challenge system similar to what is going on with the official faction system.

It's been suggested to "make bases SRP", which is a slightly misused term for "have to be approved" which I'd say would be more in line with something sensible.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin
Reply  
Offline Bootsiuv
08-04-2013, 01:52 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 637
Threads: 20
Joined: Oct 2010

(08-04-2013, 12:42 PM)Zelot Wrote: So POB's become another "only for official factions" toy?

-1

[Image: CRSJB.png]
Reply  
Offline Lumik
08-04-2013, 02:26 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 366
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2011

It´s not good idea. Your restriction is even worse than "one official faction per ID" because it´s "one PoB per multiple IDs". That is too restrictive.

For example IMG has mining bases in Omega and Tau. Makes sense inRP. But you want to force them to have only one. Why? Mining bases generally will be affected by this very strongly.

So bases as SRP or admin approved - why not. But your suggestion? No.


[Image: fFZqBwL.png][Image: 0xCVMYl.png][Image: 1MoJa5S.png]

<> Information <> Recruitment <> Wanderlust Magazine <>
Reply  
Spike Seadra
08-04-2013, 02:46 PM,
#14
Unregistered
 

(08-04-2013, 12:42 PM)Zelot Wrote: So POB's become another "only for official factions" toy?

-1
Reply  
Offline danski2011
08-04-2013, 03:06 PM,
#15
Banned
Posts: 93
Threads: 12
Joined: Jul 2012

Also have you thought about the fact that some unlawful factions are hostile with others in the same house, this means that some factions are left without the choice to build a POB altogether.

User was banned for: by user request
Time left: (Permanent)
  Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
08-04-2013, 03:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2013, 03:12 PM by Jack_Henderson.)
#16
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

This form of restriction is not needed.

Of all the 80 bases, less than 10 % have an influence on the gaming experience of most players and there are about 5 bases that are annoying and in a spot so that more than a few people are affected.

There is imo no need to reduce the number.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline SummerMcLovin
08-04-2013, 03:18 PM,
#17
Former Admin
Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

Would be nice to hear from AD (who seems to know these things) how much strain PoBs themselves have on the server? If it is something significant then maybe a limit or change to their coding would be in order, same as ship hitbox format, NPCs spawning and fighting each other but not the case with tradelane weapons (something like 0.01% of server load).

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin
Reply  
Offline aakopa
08-04-2013, 03:23 PM,
#18
Member
Posts: 566
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2012

(08-04-2013, 12:42 PM)Zelot Wrote: So POB's become another "only for official factions" toy?

-1
^^^

[Image: 500px-Bowexsig.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline SMGSterlin
08-04-2013, 03:32 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 2,207
Threads: 81
Joined: Feb 2010

Not a good idea.

Would lead to a bunch of butthurt and OORP hate/actions because "person/group A has a base here, why can't I?!".

[Image: smgsterlin.gif]
Reply  
Offline Tyler
08-04-2013, 03:38 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 840
Threads: 50
Joined: Sep 2011

Just remove them from the mod. Back to actual inRP contracts and no groups saying "no, don't have time to event/RP/whatever reason because we need to supply base" stuff..

*Tyler kicks back his feet and waits for the typical responses to flood in, mostly by the same people who themselves are too caught up with their base to notice RP dropped BIG time last year or so*

*puts popcorn in the microwave*

"Let the show begin."

[Image: Signaturev_zps8f090a17.png]
[[IND]] [[ tl;dr TeamSpeak Community - Unofficial Discovery 24/7 RP TeamSpeak Server]] [[Reavers]]
  Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode