Whatever they say, the shape is quite successful. Would be a pleasure to fly such a thing, in case it would have balanced stats. I also hope that buffed SCRA will somehow improve activity in Omegas.
Posts: 3,578
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles: Balance Dev
(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
(02-03-2015, 11:09 PM)Pancakes Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/9ZZQCUr.png
A comparison between Insurgent to Guardian. Doesn't seem too big to me, to be honest. Maybe a slightly longer nose, but that's pretty much about it.
(02-04-2015, 06:00 PM)Haste Wrote:
(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable RUSSIAN ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
Haste why not re-balance it as a Medium VHF and our LF as a lighter HF?
(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
Yeah, see how satisfied SCRA players are with their SOVIET(wut-wut?) tech?
And, beside silly jokes, you perfectly know what it means to be slow in this game. It means to be brought down fast. Be you newb or greatly-skilled, tech matters. Everything matters.
As a side-note: SCRA != communism, they are socialists. Same went to USSR, once you're mentioning it.
(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
Yeah, see how satisfied SCRA players are with their SOVIET(wut-wut?) tech?
And, beside silly jokes, you perfectly know what it means to be slow in this game. It means to be brought down fast. Be you newb or greatly-skilled, tech matters. Everything matters.
As a side-note: SCRA != communism, they are socialists. Same went to USSR, once you're mentioning it.
Please Note Sanc, we have been pretty much begging for faster ships for as long as I can remember.
Edit: Could you make a hit box comparison between the Insu/Partisan/Revo/and Scimi?
Here are two concepts that incorporate those desired vertical wings. I should say that i like the models i made some months ago 1000x better - but sadly they exceeded the polygon limitations. Those meshes are fairly crude and blocky but maybe they ll do
[align=center]just as a comparison ... http://p3d.in/0xnla ... it is so much nicer imo - but what can you do... .
If such a mesh is being used - you ll run into pretty much the same "problems" you had with Xings first batch of models. - Those models are fairly large. From the side - at least as large as the AP line BHG snubs - but more massive from the front, too - and not much shorter.
But before that thread gets no concepts - there you are.
On the other hand, Gaians require a rather new class ship for Chammy, due to the card, in which it would be able to have VHF weps, huge agility BUT weak armor and able to mount class 8/9 shields, due to the specific nature of their warfare.
Quote:due to the card, in which it would be able to have VHF weps, huge agility BUT weak armor and able to mount class 8/9 shields, due to the specific nature of their warfare.
![[Image: GWHmbwm.png]](http://i.imgur.com/GWHmbwm.png)
![[Image: cdSeFev.png]](http://i.imgur.com/cdSeFev.png)
![[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]](https://img00.deviantart.net/ca73/i/2013/123/e/a/just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png)
