• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 87 88 89 90 91 … 547 Next »
Civilian Siege Platform

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Civilian Siege Platform
Offline Sylvie557
06-08-2015, 02:15 PM,
#11
Could use a hand
Posts: 878
Threads: 73
Joined: Apr 2011

(06-08-2015, 02:12 PM)Catherfield Wrote:
(06-08-2015, 01:49 PM)Loki557 Wrote:
(06-08-2015, 01:44 PM)Sabru Wrote: +1. i was actually think that something like losing cruiser guns would be a good trade to get cruiser shield and gunboat guns like the corvo.

I'd personally prefer it being gunless with Battelship shields but thats just me =P

Not only you. I like your idea, Bustard withno guns and equiped with BS shield would be nice. However BS's shield on civilian ship? Well, you know, those toys are kinda expensive inRP and shouldn't be avaible for everyone.

About Civ. Si. Pla.: I'm against it. Giving caps for civilians is a bad idea. It's even worse than giving caps to Zoners. But it's only my opinion. Capital ships shouldn't be avaible for everyone, they're expensive and difficult to build toys.

Battleship shields seem a lot more reasonable to be availible to civilians than cruiser turrets personally as it is purely defensive and as for the expensiveness/tech aspect it is already a battleship size vessel so I kind of find that point moot at least imo

|| Aoi Iseijin |Aoi || Junker Marauders JM|- || MEMES- ||
[Image: NlHBsye.png]
Reply  
Offline Pavel
06-08-2015, 02:18 PM,
#12
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

@ Catherfield and Loki557

BS shielded liner with no guns sounds like powertrader's wet dream. I doubt that would happen guys.

And, I'm afraid, there is strong necessity for such "civilian siege platform" (not a real civilian cap equal to navy battleships!), because bases need to be destroyed somehow.
Reply  
Offline Sylvie557
06-08-2015, 02:21 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-08-2015, 02:23 PM by Sylvie557.)
#13
Could use a hand
Posts: 878
Threads: 73
Joined: Apr 2011

Powertrading with a 1800 cargo ship with 280 cruise I doubt it. Powertraders tend to use armorless 5ks even sometimes using frieghter shields for more space

EDIT: I'd still settle for cruiser shield but this was just what I'd personally like to make it actually able to preform as a carrier.

|| Aoi Iseijin |Aoi || Junker Marauders JM|- || MEMES- ||
[Image: NlHBsye.png]
Reply  
Offline Pavel
06-08-2015, 02:28 PM,
#14
On leave
Posts: 2,018
Threads: 197
Joined: Jan 2012

You'd be surprised seeing people trading ore in cau8 luxury liners.
Reply  
Offline Sylvie557
06-08-2015, 02:35 PM,
#15
Could use a hand
Posts: 878
Threads: 73
Joined: Apr 2011

Luxury Liners still have respectable cargo space though.

|| Aoi Iseijin |Aoi || Junker Marauders JM|- || MEMES- ||
[Image: NlHBsye.png]
Reply  
Offline Epo
06-08-2015, 02:48 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-08-2015, 02:53 PM by Epo.)
#16
Member
Posts: 1,706
Threads: 109
Joined: Jul 2014

You're right Pavel, what about ship like Bustard with cruiser shield, some gunboat turrets and one slot for mortar? But withno ANY docking modules and MUCH smaller cargo space. It should be enough to besiege some POBs and still weak enough to get killed by more serious battleships.
Reply  
Offline Black Widow
06-08-2015, 03:13 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-08-2015, 03:13 PM by Black Widow.)
#17
Totally no longer on probation
Posts: 2,351
Threads: 230
Joined: Jun 2008

Whats wrong with sieging a base using a standard battleship? Why do civilians need their own version?
Reply  
Offline Swifty
06-08-2015, 03:21 PM,
#18
Probation
Posts: 593
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2013

Somethin something, evolution, civilians need some love and some new toys too. I like Pavel's Idea, it'd be interesting, at least from my point of view.

In any case, it would be just another piece of scrap for me to shoot at. So personally, i don't care too much about it.

[Image: tzTtDD9.gif]
Reply  
Offline StarRaven
06-08-2015, 03:43 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 79
Threads: 6
Joined: Jan 2015

Me personally, would love to be able to mount 2 cerbs.
on my civilian carrier....not that I'll be attacking
anything, I just use it to deliver my docking module
orders, but I'd love to actually be able to somewhat
defend myself in that thing, ya know? I'd feel safer
with a slingshot than I do with terribely arced cruiser
turrets....just my thoughts....
-StarRaven-
Reply  
Offline Alestone
06-08-2015, 05:49 PM,
#20
Alestone Enterprises
Posts: 761
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2014

(06-08-2015, 01:44 PM)Sabru Wrote: forget pointlessly more powerful guns, give it a cruiser shield for ship's sake. no point with BS slots if it gets flattened really fast.

+1. i was actually think that something like losing cruiser guns would be a good trade to get cruiser shield and gunboat guns like the corvo.

This
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode