• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 81 82 83 84 85 779 Next »
Cap fighters vs Snub figthers, "balanced" fights? why so much qq?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Cap fighters vs Snub figthers, "balanced" fights? why so much qq?
Offline Antonio
08-03-2015, 09:18 AM,
#11
PvP = RP
Posts: 3,194
Threads: 196
Joined: Nov 2009
Staff roles: Systems Lead

Battleships should've been made SRP ages ago, it's too late for that now. There's absolutely nothing we can do now to prevent something mentioned above happening and the fights will never be "balanced".

[Image: BMdBL0j.png]
SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC
Reply  
Offline sindroms
08-03-2015, 09:30 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Yes, yes we can.
Introduce Mk II fighters and Mk II Caps.

Not only as a moneysink, but also for the sake of what you have described before. Make the Mk II snubs open to anyone, make the Mk II caps SRP.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Oldum
08-03-2015, 09:49 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,357
Threads: 87
Joined: Apr 2009

(08-03-2015, 09:30 AM)sindroms Wrote: Yes, yes we can.
Introduce Mk II fighters and Mk II Caps.

Not only as a moneysink, but also for the sake of what you have described before. Make the Mk II snubs open to anyone, make the Mk II caps SRP.

Good luck finding devs that are willing to do that for ya :/
A simple model gets lost amongst the depths of the dev forum, then you'd expect that making an MK. II version of each cap and fighter would ever be done ? I think not ...

However, @Mímir had the idea that actually might work, however, there is the question of bombers, which then would make caps sitting ducks, since their guns wouldn't be able to hit bombers... which would cause moar QQ when a single bomber nukes a CAU8 BS ...

So I'm not sure if there is a win-win situation out of that Tongue
Reply  
Offline Laura C.
08-03-2015, 10:01 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-03-2015, 10:25 AM by Laura C..)
#14
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

We could massively buff cap shields and hulls and in same ratio also their "slow" anti-cap guns. Result would be that cap-cap fight won´t be changed but it would take ages for bombers to take down any cap, turning them into annoyance but not big danger. This will preserve bombers as threat for gunboats (which are meant to be mainly anti-snub class, so it´s balanced that both sides are dangerous to each other). Only change would be that gunboats would be no longer threat to bigger caps (so no more cruisers kited to death by solo gunboat).

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  
Offline |nfrared
08-03-2015, 10:05 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-03-2015, 10:22 AM by |nfrared.)
#15
Member
Posts: 588
Threads: 62
Joined: Jan 2014

(08-03-2015, 09:18 AM)Antonio- Wrote: Battleships should've been made SRP ages ago, it's too late for that now. There's absolutely nothing we can do now to prevent something mentioned above happening and the fights will never be "balanced".

While yes hindsight is 20/20 and this would have been great(and alot of other tech as well cloaks etc etc...)don't do this, I was around on DUSA *shudders* server when they introduced Capital ship registrations. This made all capital vessels require to post a biography, and anyone could look up OORP information all they liked. The intention was to curb the presence of lulzy caps and limit the tech usage to those that the team there saw fit..

I'm not saying the community here would be doing this, I am saying that attempts to "grandfather in" a big change like this or anything similar to control tech usage are far too late already, and while it may look like the magic bullet, it really isn't.

That move really was the beginning of the end for that team. Please let the people here learn from that terrible mistake. There are still a few DUSA survivors who made the move here though, currently playing. I'm sure they can attest to what I am saying here.

Shard - The Faceless One
Reply  
Offline Titan*
08-03-2015, 10:22 AM,
#16
Developer
Posts: 1,075
Threads: 88
Joined: Jul 2013

Just make capital ship shields more stronger
Reply  
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
08-03-2015, 10:50 AM,
#17
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

How about we enhance Capital ship shields (: and finaly put some balance into this. Don't touch the hulls or armor upgrades, just add a shield stronger than Armor, gg. Well in other Sci-fi games and movies it's the same isn't it, Shield is huge and resistant while once shield is breached, hull is very easy dmgable.

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
  Reply  
Offline WesternPeregrine
08-03-2015, 12:30 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-03-2015, 12:32 PM by WesternPeregrine.)
#18
Kusari Vanguard
Posts: 2,311
Threads: 166
Joined: Oct 2013

How about reintroducing the shield and weapon damage types, and working them around the different classes? Just make the Caps shields the type that fighter weapons are the less effective, and vice versa.

Edit: But then again, if such "simple and obvious solutions" have been pondered time and time again, but never implemented, it must be because of balancing factors that I could not even begin to fathom. Balance Devs do something.

(Also, when did a BS shields succumbed to a fighter group? Is it possible if the BS is not static and taking all the damage?)

[+]SIGNATURE
Kusari Former Mastermind
[Image: 5tZIDB3.jpg]
========================
| The Kusari Legal Codex |
| Character Profiles | The North Star Bulletin News|
Reply  
Offline Chuba
08-03-2015, 12:41 PM,
#19
uwu
Posts: 1,519
Threads: 40
Joined: Sep 2013

How about not bring capital ships into snub fights ? Sounds easy enough right? Right??
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
08-03-2015, 01:32 PM,
#20
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(08-03-2015, 12:41 PM)Chuba Wrote: How about not bring capital ships into snub fights ? Sounds easy enough right? Right??

And who are you telling this exactly? Those who complain about cap vs snub balance because their snub brawl has been ruined by some lolwut caps, or those who do not complain at all because they are driving those caps and have no problem with ruining others' fun?

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode