• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 198 Next »
Please release the Core| Caps

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
Please release the Core| Caps
Offline Corile
05-04-2016, 11:59 AM,
#11
C::iemka pl
Posts: 3,248
Threads: 267
Joined: Apr 2014

I am also in favour of releasing the caps, for the reasons Karst outlined.




Reflections on the Revolution in Gallia
Custodi // High City of Heraklion // The Cult of Archangels
Log Filter // Post Creator // Manhattan
  Reply  
Offline 7AlphaOne1
05-04-2016, 12:00 PM,
#12
Gravedig = BAD
Posts: 942
Threads: 81
Joined: Jun 2013

I have come to notice that the engaging of zoners is not the only violation listed in the sanction. And although I understand how lack of five ships can affect the event, I don't think the Core has any shortage of ships, nor are any other shipclasses counted.

Need some software for FL?looking of a whole database? click here!
[Image: cHIlw3P.png]
Jay's Quotes
TO FLOOD OR NOT TO FLOOD, THAT IS THE QUESTION.
(04-18-2016, 12:10 AM)Garrett Jax Wrote: Well, I've managed to piss off Snak3, Ageira, LH~, Furries, Wisp, but at least Beast is happy.
Reply  
Offline Mercarryn
05-04-2016, 12:00 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:03 PM by Mercarryn.)
#13
Member
Posts: 980
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2011

(05-04-2016, 11:24 AM)Karst Wrote: I'm not talking about violations like docking on the Freeport after shooting Zoners, or engaging without RP, or anything like that.
I'm talking only about Core ships being bastilled for no other reason than following through with the declaration of hostilities.

"- Can attack lawfuls, unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls and ships which belong to a house or organisation considered hostile by The Core within their zone of influence."

(from the Core ID)

" Nowhere in your ID does it allow you to attack a Zoner ship[...]"

(from the sanction post)

????????
I doubt those 5 Makos were all of the Core fleet. There have to be much more caps as already stated.
Nontheless, Karst does have a point. The Core ID states that they can engage organisations considered hostile by them. The whole event could not even exist if the Core was not allowed to act according to this line in their ID.

Core got attacked by Zoners, Core sees Zoners as hostile and attacks the freeport. Here we go!

So, actually the bastilling does not make sense at all. If there had to be sanction, then that all Core ships get a FR5 on zoner rep to reflect their current roleplay.

*EDIT*
Read the sanction again. They should have also lost their guns for shooting the order ship again when it tried to leave the system, ok.
Reply  
Offline Shiki
05-04-2016, 12:02 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:04 PM by Shiki.)
#14
UwU
Posts: 2,754
Threads: 121
Joined: May 2015

(05-04-2016, 11:42 AM)Karst Wrote: their ID still allows them to engage "lawfuls, unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls [...] within their zone of influence.", which completely covers any engagement of Zoners in the Omicrons.

Yes, but no. Good job of taking the things out of the context.

Can attack unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls and ships which belong to a house or organisation considered hostile by the Core within their Zone of Influence.

Though yeah, zoner id is even more limited, yet they are still shooting each other somehow.

[Image: loyolabully.gif]
[Image: Q5rd5YU.png]
Reply  
Offline Mephistoles
05-04-2016, 12:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:03 PM by Mephistoles.)
#15
Gas Miners Guild
Posts: 2,347
Threads: 91
Joined: Jun 2013

I'm not quite sure what to make of this. One the one hand, it could be argued that a rule violation has occured, but was it so grossly offensive to warrant shutting down a major activity generator? Sure it's treading a line, but perhaps put in an RP context, it's not so bad.

The one thing I am sure of is that calling for Lyth to be unbanned just because there are things going on is absolutely ridiculous. He broke the rules, got sanctioned, and does not deserve special treatment simply because his faction is in the midst of a storm of drama. If you don't want to be unable to participate on the forum, don't break the forum rules. It really is that simple.

Sigma & GMG Discord Chat: https://discord.gg/d4j3W4v

[Image: stDvDRX.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Backo
05-04-2016, 12:04 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:05 PM by Backo. Edit Reason: Rheinland uber alles! )
#16
Basilica Combat Patrol
Posts: 3,594
Threads: 123
Joined: Feb 2009

(05-04-2016, 12:02 PM)Sheekochan Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 11:42 AM)Karst Wrote: their ID still allows them to engage "lawfuls, unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls [...] within their zone of influence.", which completely covers any engagement of Zoners in the Omicrons.

Yes, but no. Good job of taking the things out of the context.

Can attack unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls and ships which belong to a house or organisation considered hostile by the Core within their Zone of Influence.

"Pilot carrying this quasi-lawful ID is a Zoner, who:"

It's taken from wiki, so might be a bit outdated, no access to game atm. Sad

Republic of the Sword and Sun
  Reply  
Offline Jayce
05-04-2016, 12:05 PM,
#17
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

(05-04-2016, 12:00 PM)Mercarryn Wrote: I doubt those 5 Makos were all of the Core fleet.

http://i.imgur.com/ltNAVF2.png

This is an image of the Core shared Battleship roster. 5 of them are now in Bastille. There is only one non-shared Mako, to my knowledge, in the Core.
Reply  
Offline Stone21
05-04-2016, 12:06 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-04-2016, 12:07 PM by Stone21.)
#18
Member
Posts: 303
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2009

(05-04-2016, 11:57 AM)Wesker Wrote: Like Jayce said on skype, and by reading some opinions here, this whole thing of discovery vs. core is essentially Oorp hatred. What I'm trying to say karst is despite that I agree with you, I wouldn't expect much from the community.


Lyth needs to be unbanned. The reason people posted for him was because he and his entire faction are under attack (by Literaly the whole community) and no one is willing to help him. So he gets an extended week long ban for defending his faction? That seems unfair to me.

He deserves it, he did it with his own hand and now expects people to love his faction? I would even ban him permanently if I were one of the admins, his attitude and his faction members did a lot of harm to the game so far. OORP hate didn't happen out of the blue, there are many reasons about which players out there can tell more.
Reply  
Offline Jayce
05-04-2016, 12:07 PM,
#19
Heads Will Roll
Posts: 2,167
Threads: 141
Joined: Nov 2008

(05-04-2016, 12:06 PM)Stone21 Wrote: his attitude and his faction members did a lot of harm to the game so far.

>A lot of harm
>more players online in the past week than there has been in almost a year and a half

??

[Image: jKk7NOg.png][Image: 1iGGFXz.gif]
Reply  
Offline Sabru
05-04-2016, 12:07 PM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

(05-04-2016, 12:00 PM)Mercarryn Wrote:
(05-04-2016, 11:24 AM)Karst Wrote: I'm not talking about violations like docking on the Freeport after shooting Zoners, or engaging without RP, or anything like that.
I'm talking only about Core ships being bastilled for no other reason than following through with the declaration of hostilities.

"- Can attack lawfuls, unlawfuls, quasi-lawfuls and ships which belong to a house or organisation considered hostile by The Core within their zone of influence."

(from the Core ID)

" Nowhere in your ID does it allow you to attack a Zoner ship[...]"

(from the sanction post)

????????
I doubt those 5 Makos were all of the Core fleet. There have to be much more caps as already stated.
Nontheless, Karst does have a point. The Core ID states that they can engage organisations considered hostile by them. The whole event could not even exist if the Core was not allowed to act according to this line in their ID.

Core got attacked by Zoners, Core sees Zoners as hostile and attacks the freeport. Here we go!

So, actually the bastilling does not make sense at all. If there had to be sanction, then that all Core ships get a FR5 on zoner rep to reflect their current roleplay.

*EDIT*
Read the sanction again. They should have also lost their guns for shooting the order ship again when it tried to leave the system, ok.

The flaw in that bolded part is glaringly obvious.

At the start of this ridiculous crusade, Core had not officially declared zoners (which means as a whole) hostile. and to declared a whole section of players as hostile for the actions of a very few lolindies is absurd in-and-of itself and smacks of blatant and rampant searching for excuses to blow up everything in sight.

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Pages (9): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode