• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 600 601 602 603 604 … 780 Next »
Bombers vs. VHFs

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Ignore the future (4.85), right now, if you could, would you change bombers like this
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
44.44%
8 44.44%
No
55.56%
10 55.56%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Bombers vs. VHFs
Offline SGTMatt
11-26-2008, 11:04 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-26-2008, 11:06 AM by SGTMatt.)
#11
Member
Posts: 204
Threads: 8
Joined: Nov 2007

In a caps defense, if you are fighting bombers and turn off all of your razors and mortars and focus with defense turrets (gotta love the name) you can fend off quite a few bombers in a cap if you know how to manage targets well. Nothing ruins a bomber pilots day more then losing half hull every time they try and fire the almighty SNAC.

There are a few good bomber pilots with rediculous aiming ability with the SNAC, but most of the time they are fodder to fighters who know not to joust them. There is a reason your fighter has all that manuverability. Use it.

-edit- frozen beat me to a lot of this /signed

[Image: Shroomsbvsrogmi9.gif]

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.

-Alexis de Tocqueville-
  Reply  
Offline frozen
11-26-2008, 11:06 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 1,948
Threads: 76
Joined: Jul 2007

well everyone has waited for a long while, a bit more waiting will do you good. alot of stuff (including new factions, ships for the factions, NPC patrols for the factions, systems for the factions, new balancing, etc) is not something that can be done overnight, or in a short space of time, specially when people who are working on the mod are working voluntarily, giving up their free time to help make something they play and enjoy, much better for everyone who plays it.

i know, you lot are at a point where waiting is frustrating, and i understand that, but just a bit more. your 'nearly there' (so to speak:P)

[Image: 5d1144bd1.png]
  Reply  
Offline Wes_Janson
11-26-2008, 11:10 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 55
Threads: 7
Joined: Oct 2008

Oh, I know that were nearly there, jsut wanted to see what otehr folks thought.

Just gets frusterating when folks exploit the game mechanichs for some semi oorp pwning of you, just becasue they can.
Reply  
Offline Orin
11-26-2008, 08:10 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 3,124
Threads: 75
Joined: Aug 2008

I fully agree with Frozen. I've never lost to a bomber (or even multiple bombers) in a VHF, I've been beaten by VHFs in my bomber, and I'm taken down three bombers at once in my GB.

They're fine.
  Reply  
Offline Rudo
11-26-2008, 08:32 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-26-2008, 09:17 PM by Rudo.)
#15
Member
Posts: 1,411
Threads: 55
Joined: Jul 2008

' Wrote:i like playing freelancer due to the PVP aspects, not just the RP aspects of this server. and suffice to say, disco wouldnt be where it is if it wasnt for the perfect mix of RP and PVP (even though it is often tipped towards pvp between those who are ignorant of the forums)
Again, freelancer is restricted heavily (even though many barriers have been broken by all the modders working on various mods), and introducing a special bomber only mine means its mountable on anything that has a mine slot. it will be abused heavily, and quite frankly, i honestly dont want to see another rule springing up becuase some idiot decides to mount bomber-only epic mines on a LF and exploit the game.

1-2 with a razor+ supernova isnt easy, and not everyone can do it, becuase yes, it does require a lot of skill to do. but if a fighter falls for that, i call him stupid, because first of all, a fighter shouldnt be jousting a bomber head on anyway, and if (s)he does decide to joust head on, (s)he shouldnt do it shieldless, or without strafing while jousting. there are many techniques to out-maneuver a bomber, only difference is not many people use them.

again, wait for 4.85.

That's why I said it takes skill on the part of the bomber pilot and poor planning on the part of the VHF pilot.

Thing is, if said bomber pilot is good enough it only takes one screwup on the part of the VHF pilot. In a fight between a VHF and a Bomber, the bomber has a lot more room for error. That's my only gripe, it's not a call to tone down the bomber as a platform so much as it is to simply make the bomber's main damage come from ordinance rather than a cannon.

Basically my idea is for bombers to do something crazy, like - oh, I don't know - use bombs.

[Image: DTdrqPU.gif]
Reply  
Offline Cosmos
11-26-2008, 11:18 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 1,208
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2008

i only use my tizzies on my bomber too ripp the sheilds down on a fighter, then i SN them, its a goodway too kill people.

[Image: .png]
[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)
  Reply  
Offline jpo
11-27-2008, 02:43 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 332
Threads: 26
Joined: Aug 2008

How are bombers good against fighters? the only possible case i could see is the havok and its still less manuverable against fighters.

DO bombers really beat fighters here regularly?
Fighter is the main anti bomber class.

Reply  
Offline AceofSpades
11-27-2008, 08:45 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 491
Threads: 86
Joined: Jun 2008

So uh, here comes back the Light Fighter! Ever Snova a Light Fighter? Hah, good luck.

**added poll

-
[5:57:11 PM] InfernalTater (Lewis) [Formerly TLI-Inferno]:meanwhile, Aces 'I don't always miss my destinations, but when I do, I'm on the other side of house space.'


Quote: Seriously nerf Junkers.

Shoot to Thrill
Reply  
Offline farmerman
11-27-2008, 08:55 AM,
#19
Off in space for a bit
Posts: 3,215
Threads: 162
Joined: Jul 2008

I dunno, I don't think I'm that great of a pilot, and one on one with a fighter vs bomber, it seems the fighter wins. Although certain combinations aren't exactly right as certain bombers seem to turn too fast, etc, in my opinion. With that being balanced though, things are looking to be pretty good.

[Image: 4986_s.gif]
Faction info links: Samura Heavy Industries : LWB : Watchers
Reply  
Offline tansytansey
11-27-2008, 09:05 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

Light fighters are the bane of Bombers. But most people give them up for more power. Once you can dodge nukes in the Light Fighter there isn't a group of bombers that can beat you. And making stronger mines will make VHFs die as easy as light fighters to bombers.
In my opinion the only reason bombers are so powerful in pvp is because there is a lack of skilled light fighter pilots.

If we must change bombers, I'd suggest using Starlancer as our guide, which would also mean capital ships would have to be changed. Bombers would be much slower and have no anti-fighter weapons, but have a greater range than capital ships, and be able to launch multiple torpedoes at once, and easily kill cruisers. Cruisers would have to be slower and have less turning rate, so it is actually able to hit them at a long range. The torps would be able to be intercepted by fighters gun fire, but flying a capital ship without fighter cover would be suicide. So would flying a bomber without fighter cover, mind you. Of course, one torpedo is enough to kill a fighter if they are stupid enough to fly into one, but torps are too slow to be used as anti-fighter and bombers have a much large explosion radius because of the munitions it carrys onboard, and heavily damage any fighter that gets too close when it blows.


http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
  Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode