I finished the UN snub shipline.

[Kauket]

Well, for one, the first link of agitator has several issues with the faces (toggle subdivision, that's how you tell something is wrong, you have duplicate faces etc)

Second note, the design is over the top, there's just "too much" to it for a hf, the engines dont fit the other ship either, it's deriving from the unioner design. The ship could be made interesting if you got rid of the 'wraith' engines and the small wings at the bottom, and add a bit of shape to the bottom, it's virtually flat.

They're not wraith engines, they're the same engines on the Arbeiter and the flatness is inherent in the Arbeiter.

you're going for a heavy fighter architecture, not a VHF, right now, it's retaining a VHF look.

When I referred to the Wraith engines, I meant the positioning of the two at the bottom that tried to reference it.

[Enkidu]

Well, for one, the first link of agitator has several issues with the faces (toggle subdivision, that's how you tell something is wrong, you have duplicate faces etc)

Second note, the design is over the top, there's just "too much" to it for a hf, the engines dont fit the other ship either, it's deriving from the unioner design. The ship could be made interesting if you got rid of the 'wraith' engines and the small wings at the bottom, and add a bit of shape to the bottom, it's virtually flat.

They're not wraith engines, they're the same engines on the Arbeiter and the flatness is inherent in the Arbeiter.

you're going for a heavy fighter architecture, not a VHF, right now, it's retaining a VHF look.

When I referred to the Wraith engines, I meant the positioning of the two at the bottom that tried to reference it.

Tried the LF with more traditional engines and it makes the whole ship look wrong. Too squat. The style is still there in the mini solidaritat wings, bits of the fuselage and cockpit type.

As for the "flatness" on the HF, it's there in the Arbeiter.

[nOmnomnOm]

can you make something... or at least give more screens... that show completeness?

---

[Enkidu]

can you make something... or at least give more screens... that show completeness?

Perhaps "complete" is the wrong word here.

They're at the stage wherin I want to show them off.

[Skorak]

I think he means what we all would like "Show them in whole"

---

[nOmnomnOm]

We cannot give any valuable critique while looking at low quality pictures and angles.

---

[Enkidu]

We cannot give any valuable critique while looking at low quality pictures and angles.

Hold up - I have an RL.

[nOmnomnOm]

If u write a title called 'i finished the shipline' then I would have expected to be something ore complete done. At the very least id expect to see the models clearly from different angles. Not like what you have shown currently.

---

[casualty]

https://p3d.in/oXbeg

This looks not bad at all, would love to see other two models and generally see some of these in game as well.

EDIT: could you try to reverse the vertical stabilizer so it is aligned with rear side ones?

[Enkidu]

https://p3d.in/oXbeg

This looks not bad at all, would love to see other two models and generally see some of these in game as well.

EDIT: could you try to reverse the vertical stabilizer so it is aligned with rear side ones?

The V stabilizer is taken from the Arbeiter, so modifying it isn't a great idea. It's more likely I'll revisit the look of the other wings.